But was it worth the wait?
By Tim Ferguson
Published: 1 November 2007 15:50 GMT
MiFID, the European investment banking regulation, comes into force today and banks will be hoping their preparation for the big day has paid off.
MiFID (the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) is Europe's attempt to make financial trading easier and fairer across the continent's borders.
It was originally intended to launch in April 2006 but was put back by the European Commission to 1 November this year to give businesses a better chance of complying.
Investment organisations have had to change processes and systems to comply with the stricter reporting and trading requirements of the new regulations. Companies now need to prove best execution on deals, taking into account issues such as cost, price, speed and venue.
Read more about how MiFID is shaking up the financial industry
♦
Cheat Sheet: MiFID
♦
UK banks ready for MiFID, says FSA
♦
MiFID: Banks not ready as deadline looms
♦
MiFID: The unanswered questions
♦
FSA upgrades tech to improve MiFID monitoring
♦
MiFID compliance - regulators in the spotlight
♦
Barclays Capital prepares as MiFID looms
♦
Banks gang up for MiFID reporting
This side of MiFID is expected to prompt greater use of algorithmic and automated trading systems, which can quickly work out the best trading venues and provide a clear audit trail.
Companies will also have to publish more information on trades than they have done previously, which means new comms infrastructures must be put in place.
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has said the UK industry is well prepared for the new regulations. But there have been suggestions some organisations may have issues with the record-keeping side.
The FSA estimates that around 12,000 firms in the UK will be affected by MiFID.
There have been questions raised about the extent to which smaller domestic players - which are also required to adopt MiFID - will benefit from it.
In the run up to today's deadline, there has been much debate about what the exact requirements of MiFID are but analysts agree as long as banks are showing they are working towards compliance, the FSA will work with them to finish the job.
But persistent failure to address MiFID could lead to private and public warnings from the FSA, fines and - in the worst case scenario - closure of the firm.
Analysts feel non-compliance could also have a commercial impact as customers may choose to go with organisations that are fully MiFID-compliant, rather than those that have been found to be less so.
Ensure successful stakeholder engagement with Local Authority & school leadership teams throughout schools implementation ? Manage Complex ...
s lifespan the Project Manager will manage the production team, ensuring adherence to the project plan, delivering to quality, deadline and budget, ...
You will ensure that the Compliance Programme is executed in a timely manner, that adequate reporting and escalation of issues takes place and that ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Tim Ferguson
On a new Voyager, tackling fraud and the intellectual challenge
Interview: Nationwide IT director, Peter Stafford
Nick Heath
David Lister on smart grids and why he left RBS
Interview: National Grid CIO
Andy Jones
Why banks will push ahead with offshoring
Comment: Even if they don't want to
Catherine Stagg-Macey
Legacy IT holding back insurers
Comment: Economic crisis means finance giants must step lively
Julian Goldsmith
The City fund manager with no IT department
Q&A: How asset management is embracing the cloud...
Peter Cochrane
Peter Cochrane's Blog: How tech can solve the banking crisis
Bring on a machine-based economy