More bugs than fixes...
Published: 8 May 2006 08:40 GMT
Andrew Morton, the lead maintainer of the Linux production kernel, is worried that an increasing number of defects are appearing in the 2.6 kernel and is considering drastic action to resolve it.
In a talk at the LinuxTag conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, on Friday, Morton said: "I believe the 2.6 kernel is slowly getting buggier. It seems we're adding bugs at a higher rate than we're fixing them."
Morton admitted he hasn't yet proved this statistically but said he's noticed he is getting more emails with bug reports. If he is able to confirm the increasing defect rate, he may temporarily halt the kernel development process to spend time resolving bugs.
He said: "A little action item I've given myself is to confirm that this increasing defect rate is really happening. If it is, we need to do something about it. Kernel developers will need to reapportion their time and spend more time fixing bugs. We may possibly have a bug-fix only kernel cycle, which is purely for fixing up long-standing bugs."
One problem is that few developers are motivated to work on bugs, according to Morton. This is particularly a problem for bugs that affect old computers or peripherals, as kernel developers working for corporations don't tend to care about out-of-date hardware, he said. Nowadays, many kernel developers are employed by IT companies, such as hardware manufacturers, which can cause problems as they can mainly be motivated by self-interest.
Morton said: "If you're a company that employs a kernel maintainer, you don't have an interest in working on a five-year-old peripheral that no one is selling any more. I can understand that but it is a problem as people are still using that hardware. The presence of that bug affects the whole kernel process, and can hold up the kernel - as there are bugs but no one is fixing them."
Ingrid Marson writes for ZDNet UK
Back to Open source Special Report
Open source bugs threaten digital signatures
Red Hat and LinuxIT target Linux-baffled small businesses
Torvalds issues new Linux kernel
Do sandals and ponytails really hold back Linux?
Device support 'a must for Linux'
China's Linux growing steadily
Novell: Linux desktop set to take off
Red Hat-JBoss union: Open source comes of age
Web 2.0 prompts love for open source
Database market hits $850m
South Africa plumps for Open Documents
All about interoperability...
Norwegian desktop Linux switch halted
Bergen puts open source plans on ice...
Welsh council embraces open source
Email system for schools to serve up to 40,000...
Mobile Linux movement picks up pace
Challenging the Microsoft and Symbian behemoths...
Stories from around the web...
Q&A: Mark Spencer, CEO of open source VoIP company Digium CNET News.com
The top open source security applications CIO Today
Is open source ERP the best choice for SMBs? Search Enterprise Linux
Open source's lessons from userspace ZDNet UK
Open-source databases find their place in the enterprise Techworld.com
Choosing Desktop Linux
With its 'free' open source status and claims of high security, the appeal of Linux is clear.
Yet recent research from analysts Quocirca reveals the majority of organisations who have looked at the Desktop Linux option are still either at the experimental or limited-deployment stage.
This indicates Linux is no 'magic bullet' for Windows' shortcomings. While a move to Linux might in theory tackle some of the challenges at an operating system level, it is highly likely to create a whole bunch of other problems along the way.
To find out more about Quocirca's findings on Desktop Linux - and request a free copy of their report, click here.
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page