How will UK legislation affect ageism in IT?

What employers need to know about forthcoming law

By Jackie Luesby, 21 June 2004 09:00

COMMENT In conjunction with silicon.com's ageism in IT campaign, Jackie Luesby, a solicitor with Morgan Cole, looks at what to expect from the upcoming age discrimination legislation in the UK - and how employers should start preparing.

The age discrimination strand of the European Employment Framework Directive will be implemented in the UK in 2006. Member states are given a fair amount of discretion as to the exact terms of the legislation and in the UK we do not yet have a draft of the regulations – it's expected in early 2005.

However, extensive consultations have taken place with the Department of Trade and Industry and other member states that have already implemented age discrimination laws, so we do at least have a broad idea of the types of ageist attitudes in the workplace that the new legislation will outlaw and the form the legislation is likely to take.

We also have Age Positive, a campaign supported by the government to raise awareness of the upcoming legislation and communicate a voluntary code of conduct, which promotes best practice.

In the meantime, there is much speculation as to what the impact of the new legislation will be. As yet, we do not know:

  • In exactly what circumstances age discrimination will be justifiable. What is clear is that this will require a shift in attitude by many employers.
  • Where the burden of proof will lie. In sex discrimination cases, the employee only has to make out a basic case and the employer has to establish that he has not wrongfully discriminated - this is likely to be the case for age discrimination.
  • Whether the new 'normal' retirement age will be extended to 70 or whether it will be abolished. If the latter, an employer may have to rely on a concept such as 'no longer fit for the job' before staff can be retired off.
  • Exactly what areas of employers' policy and practice will be hit. Certain areas are obvious. For example, it is likely to be indirectly discriminatory to advertise jobs solely in magazines with a young readership such as certain fashion magazines.

Based on this, our advice to employers is as follows.

Be informed
The IT industry is dominated by youthful employees and it is interesting that of the 100 Age Positive 'Employer Champions' (of which Morgan Cole is one), there is only one IT company (BT).

To some extent it is not too surprising that there are fewer forty-somethings applying for jobs in IT when you consider that GCSE (or even 'O' level) IT studies have not been widely promoted in schools until recently.

To ensure that your organisation doesn't fall on the wrong side of law once the legislation is introduced, it is worth keeping track of the statistics. An organisation that can demonstrate that its workforce broadly mirrors the skills and training of the working population would be better placed before a tribunal than one that had no idea.

Be aware
There are practical and sensible measures to adopt in advance of the legislation to create greater awareness of unacceptable behaviour by IT managers and staff.

Adopting good habits now in an industry which, because of its predominantly young workforce, could leave its employers vulnerable to attack, is just good sense. For example, don't make the 'top salesperson of the year' prize a Club 18 to 30 holiday. You should also take a look at your job application questionnaire – don't include age or date of birth on it and review the language used in job advertisements. For example, the Age Positive code of practice makes clear that words such as 'lively', 'energetic' and 'trendy' have youthful associations and should therefore be avoided. Try 'fashion aware' instead of 'trendy' and 'outgoing' instead of 'lively'.

It's not all bad
One of the drawbacks of legislation that enforces a more diverse workforce is that an older workforce might cost an organisation more money in terms of permanent health insurance, private medical insurance, life assurance and final salary pension schemes. However, the IT industry has not traditionally been one that provides large benefit packages. This would suggest that the industry would have to dramatically change the predominant age of its workforce and its traditional benefits before it feels the impact of the new legislation in the way that many other industries might.

At the end of the day, the legislation requires an employer not to discriminate on the grounds of age, so relevant experience and skills are still perfectly valid reasons to employ or promote.

Also, there are many positive commercial benefits that a more age diverse workforce could bring, especially when it comes to product development - we are an ageing population after all. For example, when are mobile phone companies going to bring out a phone that my 75-year-old mother can use easily? Arthritic fingers can't manage small buttons and she definitely doesn't need a raft of games or a fancy ring tone - just a loud one.

Jackie Luesby is a solicitor in Morgan Cole's Employment, Pensions and Benefits group. Morgan Cole is an Age Positive 'Employer Champion' and is running an awareness-raising campaign comprised of a programme of regular updates and employment forums. They will be reporting on the detailed legislation as soon as it is published. To subscribe to the regular employment updates contact Celeste Ainge at celeste.ainge@morgan-cole.com

Comments

There are 3 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    OK, so I'm 54 and have 25 years experience in the business at a senior management level, including management of some major projects at an international level.

    I am currently employed in the private business sector so I'm not actually "looking" but have on occasion applied for positions where my CV and qualifications are spot on. Guess what - I don't even get to the short list. I get the usual "We have selected a candidate whose qualifications are closer to our requirements". Yeah right - reading between the lines, they're about 25 - 30 years my junior and have TONS of experience.

    What REALLY gets my goat though, and might be worthwhile more investigation, is the way local government agencies waste everyone's time and money by advertising positions which have clearly already been allocated internally. Everyone within the department moves up one and they're REALLY looking for someone to empty the waste paper bins.

  2. 2. Mark Henthorne

    So your 75 year old mother doesn't "need" a raft of games or a fancy ring tone, just big buttons? In whose judgement... yours or hers? It seems that ageism has raised its ugly head in the editorial, despite the former politically correct overtones, for by implication, no one who was 75 would possibly want those "youthful" extras.

  3. 3. anonymous

    I think Mark Henthorne has hit the nail on the head. It assumptions about older people that are offensive. Like "can't understand the latest technology", "will have trouble adapting to change", "can't work for a younger manager". The fact is we're people and we're all different. Don't worry Silicon your not the first. I saw an article , supposedly anti-ageist, where a group of oldies where trained up in web technology and assesed by a 28 year old Business Analyst. No one countenanced the fact that they may actually have a better understanding of the technbology than the youngster. I find my experience allows me to pick up skills much faster than less experienced developers and gives me a context into which I can place them and assess their relevance to a given application.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ