Peter Cochrane's Uncommon Sense: Looking back from 2020

And the winners are...

By Peter Cochrane, 16 December 2004 09:05

COMMENT With this column, Peter Cochrane and silicon.com are pleased to announce the winners of our competition for the best 'Uncommon Sense' idea.

The first-prize winner is Ian McNairn, an IT professional, trained biologist and serious photographer living in Buckinghamshire, England. He's been reading Peter's columns on silicon.com for over two years.

His idea: "I would like to suggest that a 'backward looking' column, from the perspective of 10 to 15 years hence, would be a powerful tool to use to both predict what may happen, and to enlighten, as you so effectively do, the masses, and hopefully the decision-makers as well, as to some of the hard decisions that need to be made now."

The four runners-up are: Dick Winchester, Richard Sheppard, John Scott and Norman Bartlett.

All will receive copies of Peter's latest book.

Without further ado, here's the column based on McNairn's suggestion...

*****

Writing as the year 2020 comes to a close, it's amazing to think how far we've come in the past 15 years.

Take the MP8 player everyone wants for Christmas. It looks great, but best of all comes with a copy of every musical track recorded in the history of mankind. Seems strange to look back at the MP3 wars between customers and the ancient recording industry.

The sheer amount of energy wasted trying to resist the transition from spinning CDs to hard drives and then holographic storage was astonishing. And it was such a restricted and contained world with almost no customer freedom compared to today. Mind you, we could soon be watching an action replay when similar devices in the lab do the same for the movie industry. Bollywood is not best pleased and the legal eagles are hovering already.

Remember all those quaint interfaces that required fingers, thumbs, eyes and ears to navigate around the simplest of devices? What a boon natural language interfaces were. Everything immediately became more of a friend rather than an instrument of frustration and mental torture.

It is now hard to imagine what a big deal the TeraFlop supercomputer was in 2005 - costing around $2m - because today we can all afford one. Turns out Gordon Moore (of Moore's Law and Moore's Wall fame) was more than right. Faster and more powerful machines begat even faster and more powerful machines that not only decoded the human genome but also cracked the mystery of protein patterns. All of this indirectly led to the great advances in molecular computing, nanotech and a revolution in programmable materials that was a real 'stage left' tsunami.

Don't take for granted the instant communications, robotics, security and monitoring systems, automated health care, production, delivery, education and training as well as intelligent machines we enjoy in 2020. It wasn't always this way. For sure the knowledge existed to create these things years ago but without joined-up machine thinking and modelling we were just poking at a hornets nest with a stick. The non-linear and chaotic system we constructed by 2010 was beyond our understanding and we had to get the machines to stabilise almost everything.

Up to about 2000 we had been waiting for technology but by 2005 we had severe technological indigestion. We bought mobile phones, PDAs, cameras and laptops by the colour of the knobs in much the same way we started to buy automobiles in the 1980s. We had little understanding of what it was we were buying and what it was capable of. We called it 'feature death' at the time but it was really 'interface blindness', an overtaxing of our human input/output capabilities.

Revolutionary interface design cured a lot of the problems but it was relenting on the Swiss Army Knife Design School Philosophy - one thing doing everything badly - that really solved the problem. At the time the IT industry was besotted by convergence but the customer wasn't, and the customer eventually won.

Looking back over the past 15 years we have passed some terrific milestones:

  • 2005: The UK and US lost their grip on the electronic games industry to Korea. The reason? They had 100Mbps broadband in the last mile, whilst the West was still pushing 0.5Mbps.

  • 2006: Electronic game spectators paid to watch players who had become celebrities on a par with footballers. Rolling power blackouts were the norm in summer and winter due to the removal of 'uneconomic power plants' to the point where the well-established 15 per cent overcapacity had been reduced to five per cent. So peak demands for electricity saw artificially brittle power systems unable to cope.

  • 2007: Most traditional telephone companies were taken out by voice over IP (VoIP) and companies such as Skype. And of course, the usage models had also changed. Why call a loved one or family when you can open up a communications channel 24x7? The telephone concept mutated to an intercom and audio conferencing paradigm. This resulted in the telcos abandoning the last mile to new companies and customers so they could concentrate on bulk bit transport and a few network-centric services vital to national, corporate and individual security.

  • 2008: Videoconferencing still wasn't selling but Wi-Fi services were almost ubiquitous throughout the world and available at very low or zero cost. VoIP mobiles were everywhere - with mobile phone companies struggling to compete. 3G was close to moribund and still trying to carve out a market. The first 'auto-immune system' was established for the net with autonomous 'killer bots' locating and negating all virus, worm, Trojan horse and spyware attacks.

  • 2009: The last circuit-switched services were taken down and we began to communicate via 100 per cent Internet Protocol (IP) networks. Second generation auto-immune system trials demonstrated the feasibility of tracking down hackers, spammers and criminals. All company IT and security departments disappeared - just as typing pools once did and for many of the same reasons. If you were not tech-aware and self-sufficient you were almost certainly out of a job.

  • 2010: New slimmed-down network operating companies emerged with capital and operating expenditures that were less than 10 per cent of the existing phone companies they soon replaced. Japan and Korea upgraded to 1000Mbps home and office broadband connections whilst the West still pondered why anyone would want 100Mbps delivery. One-terabyte (TB) storage on home and office machines became a minimum requirement along with 10GB of RAM and 10GHz clocks. The first voice interfaces for noisy environments became available and invoked a new design revolution.

  • 2011: Radio, TV, games, gambling, healthcare, medicare, mobile working, communications, appliances, logistics, surveillance, security, retail, travel - all became available on IP-based networks. At last videoconferencing took off because the industry discovered what Hollywood knew in the 1930s - emotion matters in communication.

  • 2012: The human protein stack was decoded - 10 years earlier than predicted -through the use of massive computational power and nanotechnology devices. The first self-sustained silicon life forms spontaneously emerged in a global network of supercomputers and brought about a radical change in the way we thought and the way we produced software and designed systems.

  • 2013: Evolutionary system design, manufacture and command and control were finally accepted as the only viable solution to all major problems and systems. At last corporations fully embraced the notion of business modelling as a vital decision making tool.

  • 2014: Human prosthetics and implants based on nano-material and biological programming of proteins equalling and/or exceeding the performance of the original piece parts appeared. As a result human life times exceeding 100 years became the norm in the rich countries.

  • 2015: Natural language interfaces became standard in all appliances and devices. We didn't know it but we'd see even more change in the five years leading up to 2020 than in the previous 20.

So why was all this so hard to predict? The five-year horizon for technological advances is always relatively easy to pin down because everything is in the lab being developed. The 10-year horizon is more problematic because some elements are not yet developed, whilst for 20 years we have very little relevant information on which to make judgements. Worse, we are almost clueless when it comes to predicting what people will do with technology and how society will reshape. However, with the next generation of supercomputers we might just overcome this.

Winning column idea chosen on 14 December. Worked a very full day and cogitated on the near future. Started typing late pm on the 14th. Consumed copious amounts of coffee and despatched column to silicon.com from my home office very early on the 15th via a Wi-Fi link.

Comments

There are 18 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Darrall Pullen

    I wish I had the forethought and 'balls' to enter the competition in the first instance. Grats to the winner though.....great idea. Peter just one thing... what an excellent piece of fiction, you have probably just extrapolated the next 15 years of development from the ICT sector. Shame there is no IP on these ideas, you could be a billionaire filing your report from your own OC192 connection on your private island relocated and anchored just to the right of the Caribbean.
    PS Your book is on my Christmas list...honest

  2. 2. MikeW

    A interesting and thought-provoking read, well written - though should have noted that the "rich countries" weren't necessarily who we might naively think they were !

    No mention of how the terrorists or anti-globalisers were tamed either ...

    Pity there's no-one in government/politics with adequate grasp of technology issues ... they're only concerned with next week's headlines.

  3. 3. anonymous

    Future Storage Technology like Rewritable Holographics will be imparative for Success.

    Nice article.

  4. 4. anonymous

    You wrote:

    'Faster and more powerful machines begat even faster and more powerful machines that not only decoded the human genome but also cracked the mystery of protein patterns.'
    and
    'The non-linear and chaotic system we constructed by 2010 was beyond our understanding and we had to get the machines to stabilise almost everything.'

    With the machines getting faster and faster, why would they stop at human-level intelligence? You imply that they will be beyond our understanding, but the implications of this are truly tremendous.

    I doubt that a super-intelligence would have the same interests and objectives as the human race.

  5. 5. Alistair Thomas

    I agree, nice article.

    I think it a techie's wet dream that we're all going to become tech-aware. The reason than human interfaces are so important to future development is that the vast majority of humans are tech-averse. They want the functionality, they suffer a clumsy interface to get what they want up to a point, but at it's best the tech becomes invisible (and totally taken for granted).

    You may be right that IT depts etc will dissappear but it will be because machines have become clever enough to talk to people without technicial intermediaries and not because people become tech-aware.

    Sorry it was a negative, but in such a contraversial subject, one negative means that there were 20 things about which I thought you might be right.

    Great article - loved it - got me thinking!

    The perfect sort of forward looking thing to put out in the run up to the New Year.

    Thanks and Merry Christmas.

  6. 6. Rob Garner

    Nice vision, and the technology will be there, not sure about societies ability to respond and adapt in the same time scale. large sections of the developed world still have not taken to PC's after 25 years.

  7. 7. Osman Khareef

    No! No! No! Cochrane. You're way off...way off! (to misquote a phrase). It seems everything you do is done in haste, including this latest column.
    In the next 20 years, there will still be IT departments, and techies and even video-conferencing. Nanotechnology is and will remain a myth (perpetuated by entrepreneur bullshitters) as is the fantasy of understanding protein/DNA interactions. The best and cheapest computer power will still be the human brain.
    There will be, for sure, environmental disasters and human disasters (such as bird flu) and fundamental shifts in economic power('cos of China). Nor have you factored into any of this the impact of Islam. The next 20 years will not be Western-centric. The West will decline because there will no longer be anyone who knows how to do anything practical - they will all be marketeers and consultants.

  8. 8. anonymous

    You forgot the bits about:
    -China becoming a superpower (financed by those idiots who shop at Wal-Mart);
    - America's demise into oblivion;
    - The Energy Wars and the end of the Oil Economy;
    - The Water Wars and the start of the Water Economy;
    - The battle against fundamentalism;
    - Climate Change.

  9. 9. anonymous

    Thank god someone can be bothered to speak out against the philistine Cochrane's obvious drivel. Wow, we'll be doing video confing by IP, what a prediction! There'll be surprises in the future, for sure, and we can look forward to them, but not from Cochrane and his fawning geek admirers.

  10. 10. anonymous

    You forgot to mention the rise and rise of religious fundamentalism in the USA and their 2nd Luddite revolution in 2012 with wholesale closure of IT departments in Tennessee (talk of 'evolution' in computers caused uproar).

    The formation of city states of Los Angeles, New York and Chicago in 2017-8 seemed to skip your attention too.

  11. 11. Graham Brown

    Our unsustainable way of life will not be sustained. Supercomputers will predict the effects of climate change, population explosion, soil erosion, overfishing and the extinction of 50% of species from amphibians to whales. Politicians will downplay the results, call for more evidence and pursue economic growth until the economic collapse, desertification of the temperate grasslands, onset of freshwater disputes, flooding of Bangladesh etc.

  12. 12. Paul

    Damnit, where's my flying car?

    You missed off the prediction of the personal flying car, damnit! What kind of soothsayer are you if you don't include that - every major writer's said we'll have one one day, and I'm still waiting, and now you don't even mention it!

    Damn!
    :-)

  13. 13. Tony Blair

    Everyone will be working for the government

    You forgot that I taxed everyone so heavily in the mid 2000's and drove so many small businesses down the tubes, and then was able to nationalise the three companies left operating in the UK (Tescsainsasda's, PriceWaterhouseCoopAndersons and Barcnationlloyds), and thereby make every uk citizen a government worker.

    My colleague David Blunkett's spy network built on the civil contingencies act of 2004 to ensure that everyone was microchipped, tracked with the EU Gallileo project, and we thus had total control of the citizenry.

    in 2012, the human-computer interface made it possible to monitor people's thoughts and emotions, and we were then able to enforce political correctness properly, allowing us to properly convict people of thought crime; naturally anyone who opposed this couldn't be allowed to run free and joined the 500,000 or so political terrorists (formerly members of other political parties) in the prison camps.

    We can now say the British people are free - free from hunger, free from terror, free from illegal thoughts - thanks to the chips planted in their heads!

  14. 14. Jojo

    I'm sure you're partially right about some of this and yet very wrong overall, because you missed (or misinterpreted the importance) of some very important elements of the future.

    First - the robot worker who will replace humans:
    Development of humanoid robots is moving forward at a fast pace in Korea and Japan. See http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200412/200412220012.html. I think that within 5, perhaps 10 years at the outside, robots will be doing a lot of the blue-collar work that is currently being done by humans. Forget about offshoring to cheaper economies - robots will be able to do any work cheaper, faster and more efficiently. Us humans will then be able to spend much more (unemployed) time thinking of "innovations". Or maybe we can learn how to read, write, multiply and spell. Anyway, we'll finally have all that free time that technology was supposed to bring to us years ago. Of course, we won't have jobs, so it is difficult to envision how our present capitalist system will continue. Perhaps robots will provide us with everything we need. Or maybe they will turn the world into a copy of a Terminator movie.

    Second - genetic cloning:
    Not sure what effect this will have but I think it will be substantial.

    Third - silicon life forms:
    What makes you think that once such life forms are developed that they will stop developing (evolving) further? Last century, Wired 3.03 (way back in 1995) ran an interesting piece on this called "Faded Genes" where humans are eventually supplanted by machine intelligence by 2088. I personally think it will happen a lot sooner than that. See http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.03/blonder.if.html.

  15. 15. Ticks

    So many factors could have huge implications, global ecological disaters or western financial collapse, could cause a huge shift in social priorities. Universal language translation being made freely available would break down the biggest nationalist barriers, making the world a more open place, improvements in medical care could result in population explosions, requiring enforced birth control.

    Scientific break throughs are just one peice of the equation, anti-technology religions and terrorism will most probably appear as the human race is drawn further away from it's 'natural' process.

    May we live in interesting times !

  16. 16. Charles E. Finney

    I'm somewhat intrigued at the focus on technological change, with essentially no consideration for social, economic and political impact. How does religion change if the path to imortality is visable in 2020? What are the potential implications politically and economically of marginal cost of production going to zero? What are the social implication if the high priests of medicine are reduced to being biological mechanics?

    May we live in interesting times.

    Thank you,

  17. 17. anonymous

    Why do you think a voice interface would be a good thing? Do you live in a bubble? I live in New York City, where on any given street corner as many people are jabbering away into cellphones as not. I've had conversations on my cellphone where I can overhear the cellphone conversation of the person standing next to the person I'm talking to. All that talk is intrusive. Can you imagine working in an office where everyone is talking to something all the time?

    And that level of annoyance only pertains assuming voice recongnition works perfectly. Even when talking to a native Engish speaker I get "What do you mean?" fairly regularly. I would expect a computer to do much worse, especially if I'm to be allowed natural speech without a severe vocabulary restriction. Imagine if every electronic device within electronic earshot asked "What?" every time you opened your mouth.

  18. 18. Oli Rhys

    Not sure I agree - The only technology I think is about right is the voice control in noisy enviroments.

    I would assume that you were forecasting 2020 by looking at what has happened since 1990.

    The Y2K problem is what fuelled so much of the expansion in the tech market, and there isn't another one of those around the corner.

    Personally, I do think telecoms will be important, but it will mostly be a matter of getting the world to catch up and less about a world of flying cars!

    The things to watch out for will be Linux promotion from Asia (M$ becoming a holding company in the style of IBM), Internet TV (huge potential), A global ressesion when confidence in a western economy based on subcontracting to the east is lost when eastern companies learn how to manage the whole process themselves through new global communication channels.

    Of course, you need to make sure this page gets deleted by then to save our blushes.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ