By Jim Hu, 22 December 2004 10:20
NEWS
A district judge in New York has refused to accept a guilty plea from a former America Online employee charged with stealing 92 million email addresses from the online giant, citing vagueness in the prosecutors' argument that the theft violated the federal Can-Spam Act.
US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein on Tuesday postponed the hearing in hopes of consulting with lawmakers in Washington, D.C., about specifics in the Can-Spam Act's definition of why the defendant's practices were considered in violation of the law, a US Attorney's Office spokeswoman confirmed. Hellerstein will rehear the case on 28 January.
The judgment comes after federal prosecutors on Tuesday struck a plea agreement with former AOL engineer Jason Smathers, who is accused of filching the email addresses and selling the list to spammers. Smathers allegedly used another employee's access code to steal AOL's entire database of screen names last spring, according to a court document.
Authorities said Smathers sold the list for $100,000 to Sean Dunaway, another defendant named in the complaint, who runs an online gambling site. Dunaway, in turn, sold chunks of the list to an unnamed spammer who eventually cooperated with government investigators as part of the suit, the court papers said.
Users of AOL's various services are allowed to create multiple screen names to sign on, send email and chat with other users on IM. While Smathers was able to download these screen names onto a separate disc, investigators said credit card numbers were not compromised during the theft.
The plea agreement could result in a prison sentence of up to two years and a hefty fine, according the Associate Press, citing a person familiar with the talks.
"We're going to continue to fully support the US Attorney's efforts here any way we can," AOL spokesman Nicholas Graham said in an email statement. "This is an ongoing issue, and we continue to believe that justice will take its proper course in this matter."
Since President Bush signed the federal anti-spam law a year ago, called the Can-Spam Act, companies and government officials have taken a harder stance against bulk spammers and fraudulent email.
The law allows prosecutors and companies to sue bulk emailers who send messages with falsified email headers and "sexually oriented" messages that are not properly labelled. Punishment could include prison terms.
Jim Hu writes for CNET News.com.
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. A Spamee
Biggest joke of year 2004:
"Since President Bush signed the federal anti-spam law a year ago, called the Can-Spam Act, companies and government officials have taken a harder stance against bulk spammers and fraudulent email."
But I'm not laughing, and neither are millions of other internet users whose e-mail communications have been destroyed by US spammers.