"How would you like to pay - credit card or fingerprint?"

Grocer says customers are pleased to give it the finger

By Jo Best, 1 February 2005 16:00

NEWS One supermarket has given its customers the choice of paying by fingerprint at its shop in the state of Washington - and found customers surprisingly willing to give the finger instead of payment at the checkout.

US chain Thriftway introduced the PayByTouch system in its shop in the Seattle area in 2002 and now sees thousands of transactions a month using the payment method.

Once enrolled on the PayByTouch system, users give their fingerprint as verification at the checkout and then chooses which of the credit cards that they've registered with the store they want to pay the bill with.

Thriftway president Paul Kapioski said rather than shying away from the technology due to privacy concerns, customer demand ensured the biometric payment made it past the pilot stage.

The fingerprint payment system was initially scheduled for a 60-day trial but "people were quick to warm up to it... after 60 days, we made it part of our payment package," he told the Retail Fraud Conference in London today.

"We found people came to the store because of this - lots of senior citizens felt more secure not carrying money to the store... The major concern is 'biometric, fingerprint, what's it going to be used for?'... Once [customers] understood what it was used for, it became a non-issue," he said.

Kapioski added that one man even drove 400 miles to use the technology.

Kapioski said the main business driver for the biometrics was cost, allowing the retailer to shave cents off the average cost of an electronic payment transaction. With the biometric system, customers are encouraged to use their debit card - which cost the company almost half as much as the same payment by credit card, for example.

Fraudulent transactions have dropped dramatically due to the system, Kapioski said, which now makes up 30 per cent of Thriftway's electronic payments.

"During the last two, two and a half years... there's not been a single fraudulent transaction on this system," he said.

John Davison, VP and research director at analyst house Gartner, said that customers were generally willing to accept technologies, such as RFID, that could infringe their privacy if the benefits of such technology could be 'sold' to them.

"Will customers object to RFID? Yes, if you don't sell it to them," he said. "Over two-thirds of customers will accept RFID if you sell them the basic utilities."

However, he added that certain areas of retail were still technology sacred. "The nearer you get RFID to the payment process, consumers get less keen. When you start linking... to their personal information, they're even less keen."

Comments

There are 7 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. xownzx

    Great, now you have your data on file at the bank and at the supermarket. For some reason this feels less secure. you figure it out.

  2. 2. Ken

    All it would take is for a member of staff to have a very clean sheet of clear acetate over the scanner and they could easily steal your fingerprint. then shop 'till they drop'

    I'd rather pay with cash thank you.

  3. 3. anonymous

    Doesn't the previous contributor realise that many fingerprint systems have 'pulse' detection, making use of an artificial fingerprint extremely difficult?

  4. 4. Sandra

    I think finger printing verses credit card is a good idea. It would help with crime and it shouldn't be seen as power and control by the government through the back door after all if you have nothing to feel guilty of why worry. Progress has to be made and we have to move forward. We have to use technology to its full advantage but also keep a few tight rules concerning our human rights. Doesn't everyone want to live in a safer society. This is just a small step towards the prevention of fraud.

  5. 5. John B.

    I'm looking forward to using it. Heck, the cheque is just a piece of paper with all my personal and financial information on it. I won't have to take out my superdividend card, or any other for that matter. Sounds extremely convenient to me. I like the fact that their just data points and not an actual stored fingerprint. Privacy advocates will scream, but why haven't they screamed about cheques? This seems to protect my privacy, not invade it.

  6. 6. Andrew Lewis

    Sounds great! I have a wallet full of credit cards, debit cards, membership cards etc all the same size. Everyone wants to give you cards for this that and the other in credit card size to fit in your wallet!
    Pay by fingerprint and cut down on fraud and the amount of rubbish in your wallet.
    Maybe some of the sceptics who have posted adverse comments have been watching too many Bond films?!
    Give it a go - if it cuts fraud and persuades a fraudster that it might be better to do an honest days work like most people it must be worth trying.

  7. 7. sassy mouth

    i think this is stupied and how do you fell about that

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ