By David Berlind, 7 March 2005 16:40
NEWS
A Hong-Kong based company wants 12 per cent of all profits from both iTunes and iPod sales, claiming it holds the patents to the DRM technology that governs the use of downloads through Apple's online music service.
According to a post on the Pat-rights company website, the patent governs the verification of a single user before permitting the user to download tracks.
"[iTunes'] computer registration involves a process of identity verification in which a user is required to key in into the computer the correct Apple ID and password he used to purchase the song....This is certainly a patentable technology. If iTunes does not patent it, there must be a very good reason for them not to do so - someone else has patented this.
While Apple declined to comment the company has been in negotiations with Pat-rights for some time, according to the Joseph J Zito, the patent lawyer representing Pat-rights.
"We expect to be successful in licensing negotiations with Apple. They're a good company that understands intellectual property rights and we think they'll be reasonable," he said. "My client was first in touch with Apple during the months of December and January so Apple has been aware of the issue for a couple of months."
Zito declined to comment on whether the patent is a working implementation or purely a design. "That's going to be an important issue in this case as it is in all such cases. This case will hinge on a lot of things so I'd rather not comment on what our plan is," he said.
Zito said that the patent may be applicable to a variety of DRM schemes but the lawyer said he isn't aware of any plans to take action against other companies.
Currently, Pat-rights is gunning for 12 per cent of Apple iPod and iTunes profits but if the matter comes to court, the pay-off could be equally lucrative for the patent holder. If Apple is found to have wilfully infringed the patent, damages could be trebled.
If the issue is not settled by 21 March, Pat-rights intends to file suit.
Apple is currently involved in another patent battle with Advanced Audio Devices, which claims iTunes violates its patent, filed in 2003, on a "music jukebox which is configured for storing a music library therein".
David Berlind writes for ZDNet.com
Comments
There are 3 comments. Join the discussion
1. Destroy Innovation
Well there you go then, patents will destroy innovation... Just wait till shopping cart patents start flying around, goodbye ecommerce, adios new economy, supidity through law..
How would Microsoft or anyone have established their companies if patents to this level were around in the 1970s...?
2. Simon
There must be more to it than :
"[iTunes'] computer registration involves a process of identity verification in which a user is required to key in into the computer the correct Apple ID and password he used to purchase the song....This is certainly a patentable technology. If iTunes does not patent it, there must be a very good reason for them not to do so - someone else has patented this."
Err, that sounds very much like "user enters their ID and password", and if that is patentable then it proves why we desperately need to abandon patents ! Perhaps the reason Appple didn't patent it is that it's covered by the "obvious" and "prior art" exclusions that would prevent a patent being issued.
3. anonymous
So why didn't this company 'go after' the very first computer or program which required a username/password to gain access? Surely that system, and those that came since, must have been in breach of this patent?
or is it that iTunes is the only one to have made any money...?
I hope any court sees through this charade, and sends them packing.