By Andy McCue, 20 June 2005 15:45
NEWS The Inland Revenue has warned that the cost of overpayments it has had to write off as a result of problems with the tax credit computer system could rise to £51m.
A software error on the tax credits IT system, which was designed by EDS, resulted in overpayments to 455,000 households in 2003 amounting to £94m.
The Inland Revenue has made a decision to write off individual overpayments of less than £300, totalling some £37m. But the tax office has now warned in its annual report that it may also write off £8m to £14m of the remaining £57m in overpayments, which remained because some tax credit claimants could successfully maintain their overpayment was a result of a mistake by the Inland Revenue.
The admission comes at the same time that a report by the Adjudicator's Office reveals complaints against the taxman have increased over the last year largely on the back of the tax credit problems.
The Adjudicator's Office annual report shows over half of the complaints made against the Inland Revenue were about the tax credit system and 86 per cent of those were upheld in the complainants' favour.
The report said: "We have also recently seen a marked increase in the number of Tax Credit complaints that we are taking up for investigation. Two years have passed since the scheme's introduction and, clearly, the tax credit system is still not working well for many claimants. At the heart of many of the problems that we investigate is the sensitive issue of overpayments arising from Inland Revenue errors."

Comments
There are 2 comments. Join the discussion
1. Steve Watkins
Isn't it about time that the civil servants who 'work' at the Inland Revenue paid for their own mistakes? Why should the REAL tasxpayer have to pay (a) their wages and (b) for their mistakes? Don't forget that the taxes that they supposedly pay are actaully paid for by real taxpayers actually working in the real world providing a real service.
2. Roger Huffadine
Why do EDS keep being awarded government contracts?
I believe that an independent investigator should have a look for some corruption in the awarding of government contracts.
How can you keep awarding contracts to a company that repeatedly screws up?