Intel faces AMD lawsuit for "illegal" behaviour

We're tired of their bully-boy tactics, says exasperated rival

By Matt Loney, 29 June 2005 11:11

NEWS AMD has filed a lawsuit against Intel in the American courts accusing the chipmaker of forcing major customers to accept exclusive deals and withholding rebates and marketing subsidies to punish those customers who, it says, buy more AMD processors than agreed with Intel.

In the lawsuit, which was filed in the US District Court of Delaware, AMD charges that Intel also threatens retaliation against customers doing business with AMD, has established quotas keeping retailers from selling the computers they want, and forces PC makers to boycott AMD product launches.

In the 48-page filing, which has an exasperated tone, AMD highlights its efforts - most of which it claims were rebuffed - to persuade major original equipment manufacturers to use its processors. For instance, when AMD offered HP, the biggest computer maker in the world, a million processors for free, HP took only 160,000, said AMD.

In an open letter, AMD chief executive Hector Ruiz explained the lawsuit, saying: "Our competitor has harmed and limited competition in the microprocessor industry. On behalf of ourselves, our customers and partners, and consumers worldwide, we have been forced to take action."

For most competitive situations, this is just business, said Ruiz. "But from a monopolist, this is illegal."

Ruiz went on to say Intel's behaviour is much more than meets the eye. "You may not have been aware but Intel's illegal actions hurt consumers - everyday. Computer buyers pay higher prices inflated by Intel's monopoly profits. Less innovation is produced because less competition exists. Purchasers lose their fundamental right to choose the best technology available."

The lawsuit follows a call from Japan's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) earlier this year for Intel to halt the practice of requiring PC makers to limit the use of competitors' chips in exchange for monetary rebates.

Intel, which accepted the FTC recommendations, noted it disagreed with the agency's 'findings of fact' underlying their allegations and the application of law in the recommendations.

Matt Loney writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    Intel is indeed the monster of the computing world. Rationally, AMD is very accurate in their law suit.

    Ironically, from the perspective of an insider at Intel and my relationships with many Intel' s OEM, I have to support AMD and Hector Ruis in their quest to stop illegal business practice and monopoly. In my knowledge, I know Intel had paid their competitors to stop shipments as well as punished their business partners if they used AMD processor (at least nearly a decade to my knowledge).

    I wish our judiscial system sucess in gaining their knowledge on this unfair/business practice.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ