By Dan Ilett, 25 April 2006 09:00
NEWS
Some people argue the days of using cash are numbered; already more shopping is done using debit cards than cash.
Plastic has certainly outstripped the use of cheques - which some shops won't even accept anymore. So what does this inevitable march of the credit and debit card mean for the ATM, the humble 'hole in the wall' where most of us pick up our paper spending money?
Analyst Tower Group predicts that we could soon see the demise of the ATM as new technologies such as contactless and biometric payments replace the old-fashioned folding money.
Chris Skinner, associate director of Tower Group, argues: "If you can pay for things with fingers, why would you use cash?
"The more you see contactless payments the less you will see ATMs. What will their use be? Maybe ticketing and [phone] top-ups but I don't see banks spending money on that."
Visits to the cash machine have become part of everyday life. The world's first ATM emerged in London in the late 1960s but it wasn't until the 1980s that banks started to deploy them on a nationwide scale.
For most of that time their purpose has been to simply dispense cash but now banks are realising the added value of their machines.
The technology inside ATMs has also seen a rapid upgrade over the last few years, making them much more flexible in what they offer.
For example, some ATMs are starting to run on Windows XP, and banks and other companies are seeing opportunities in personalised advertising, ticketing and other integrating applications.Graham Mott, head of development for Link, the ATM company, says: "Mobile phone top-ups are the most obvious of these [opportunities]. It's not universal yet but beyond that ATMs are seen as multimedia terminals."
But adding too many services means the risk of queues.
Mott says: "In some countries you can buy tickets on them but [UK] ATMs are busier so there's a problem with queues. You don't want to extend the queue time with someone trying to buy a train ticket.
"There's also advertising," he adds. "With Windows XP you can generate pretty good graphics and use things like film tie-ins and the use of customer relationship management (CRM) to channel to customers. It's a very effective way of targeting people. They can press a button to see further information on adverts."
CRM is an important step, Mott says, and banks are now looking at providing in ATMs the same type of personalised marketing - such as overdraft extension offers - as they do via mail marketing.
Research from analyst Forrester last year said that high street banks must improve their customer service and highlighted making better use of customer data for a more personalised service.
So while cash might be on the way out, the cash machine is likely to evolve into a richer channel that customers can use for a range of services, taking the pressure off the branch.
As Roger Bracken, VP of financial solutions division for ATM manufacturer NCR, told silicon.com: "Wouldn't it be nice if, say as a premiere customer, you were to get a customised reception when you use an ATM. There's going to be a much greater level of personalisation in this area.
"That's just what we're doing in the ATM interface. There's a huge investment from banks in branch infrastructure trying to take more transactions away from the counter."

Comments
There are 18 comments. Join the discussion
1. Julian Nicholls
I hope they're not heading for extinction, or conversely becoming 'richer' for that matter.
There is no easier way to budget than paying for things with folding notes. Neither the embarassment of card rejection or unauthorised overdraft fees appeal to me.
Queuing for a popular machine is only going to be worse if people are bombarded with adverts or film trailers.
I (and most people) would like to walk up to the machine, get a balance and some cash, and leave. I'd certainly like the person in front to be doing that, not watching MiIII for 2 minutes.
2. Realist
What a ridiculous idea!
Obviously Mr Skinner has never queued to purchase a beer in a busy pub! Can you imagine the uk population paying for all their drinks at the weekend with their plastic (or finger)? What happens when payment is not accepted, and youve got 100 angry youths waiting to get their pint standing behind you? The hospitals will be overflowing!
Plastic is for bills and lifestyle purchases. Paper is for the weekend on the town!
3. Rob Penn
PLEASE! Somebody reign the banks in, they don't need another source of income, they rip us off as it is, they waste so much money on simple business practices like Marketing and I do mean waste.
Yet they still charge ridiculous amounts in fees (as highlighted by the recent press coverage concerning the OFT and credit cards).
When are we all going to stop being taken for a ride.
4. Samuel Hughes
Surely this research will be disproved, customers want less hassle not more. Cash is security for most of the population, how are kids going to buy sweets, college students their draft beer and hippies their drugs ,... oh wait, that's not necessarily a good thing!
ATM's already take too long to get to with people checking their balance then drawing £10 and checking their balance again in case the machine has risen up against them and ripped them off. What we need are machines that just give cash and nothing else, I mean what are overdrafts for!!!
5. Ken Munn
Windows XP?
I don't want buggy s/w running my bank account, thanks all the same!
6. anonymous
I am surprised that the security issue was not raised in this article. In my local area ATM's have been attacked by card reader crooks and I no longer use ATM's.
"Cash-Back" at POS terminals is far safer.
7. Another realist
Chris Skinner argues: "If you can pay for things with fingers, why would you use cash?
Answer: Because my fingerprints ARE NOT used, and cash doesn't leave a "spending habits" ID data trail that people like Chris Skinner can get their filthy hands on.
8. Jeremy Wickins
Does anyone else wonder just how much banks are in league with government? As Samuel Hughes hints at, without cash, the benevolent government will be able to keep track of all payments, so that your dubious activities will all be on a database. At a stroke, illegal activities become much more difficult (have you seen the adverts in the UK about not paying cash-in-hand?), and those little things that are not illegal, but that you wish to keep to yourself (the odd copy of Playboy/girl, the affair, donations to anti-government policy pressure groups etc) become so much hassle that "gentle" pressure is put on us all to behave like good Christian Democrats.
I know, I'm paranoid, but just think how easy law "enforcement" or social engineering become if we "voluntarily" give trackable spending details into a large, unified database, verified by our biometrics.
9. Graham Coles
What idiot came up with the idea of using Windows XP for an ATM.
So far the only change I have seen from this is the ATM network of two American banks getting infected by a windows worm which stopped them working a couple of years back.
As for the 'wonderful opportunity with graphics' referred to, Natwest appear to be taking the piss. Now when I get money out it displays a picture of a bank card when it returns my card, a picture of a receipt when it issues my receipt and a picture of a 20 pound note when it dispenses my money ...
I wonder if the brainless moron who came up with this gem would even admit to it. If you can't tell the three items apart without help, you shouldn't be allowed to use the damn cashpoint!
I hope we don't get any more 'improvements' like this ...
10. Richard Davies
With cash though you can see what you've spent or not spent (and will probably spend less in shops than if paying via easy plastic as it feels more real somehow).
My concern would be checking for over payments etc. you can check your change at the counter but how do you do this with electronic cash?
11. Nick Blake
XP running ATM's - now that's worrying!
Where has Mr Mott been for the last few years? Does he think XP is the only commercial o/s that can do decent graphics?
A combination of decent graphics, robust operation and security - I can't believe that XP is his choice.
12. Charles Smith
The Bank for my small business charges 3% to handle cash. As a consequence I do not use their services for that.
If they withdraw ATM's for personal accounts I'll simply join the queue at a Branch office and demand human interaction. Most older people will remember that is why the Banks introduced ATM's.
Those interested in electronic funding should look more closely at E-Gold. Low cost, fast and backed up by real physical gold. The Bank's money system of (virtual) money enmeshed with Derivative credit structures could collapse overnight.
13. Richard A
The whole point of cash in your pocket is that (wait for it).... you have cash. In your pocket! Brilliant.
Cash is ideal for day-to-day budgeting and money management. It also has the benefit that you can easily lend, borrow or stash it for emergencies.
With contactless payments (such as the horrendous Oyster Card) you never know how much credit is available until you try to use it - unless of course you keep the balance permanently high where it is earning interest only for LT.
What is more, losing twenty quid on a drunken night out is annoying but losing an insecure contactless payment card like Oyster could be disasterous.
And don't get me started on reliability and failure rates...
14. anonymous
Graphics? Adverts?
I don't want either with my cash, thanks. The Nationwide BS ATMs have visbly slowed the quese while users have to watch mindless videos of money being ejected... Groan.
And I don't want adverts - personalised or otherwise - when I draw £20 for some shopping. I just want the cash.
When will marketing companies - and more importantly the companies which inflate product costs by employing them - learn that I (and I'm sure countless others like me) have NEVER bought anything becuase it was advertised. Never. Ever. I buy things because I want them; not becuase they want me to have them...
15. anonymous
If you value your privacy get rid of your cards.
16. Alan Williams
The more data they have the less they will know. They still think intelligence can be gathered.
17. Alan Williams
The more data they have the less they will know. They still think intelligence can be gathered.
18. Andrew Robb
If your going out to get legless, the last thing you should take with you is plastic with access to all your funds!
With Chip'n'pin moving liability onto the hapless customer and being so easy to "shoulder surf" or eavesdrop, plastic is not the relatively safe option for customers it once was.