EC excludes software from patent law

Patent campaigners shocked by apparent change of stance...

By Ingrid Marson, 25 May 2006 08:30

NEWS

Software patent campaigners were shocked on Wednesday by an apparent change of stance on software patents by the European Commission.

The European Commission said last week that computer programs will be excluded from patentability in the upcoming Community Patent legislation, and that the European Patent Office (EPO) will be bound by this law.

The EC said in a statement: "The EPO would... apply and be bound by a new unitary Community law with respect to Community patents. The draft Community Patent regulation confirms in its Article 28.1(a) that patents granted for a subject matter (such as computer programs), which is excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 52 EPC [European Patent Convention], may be invalidated in a relevant court proceeding."

This statement appears to contradict what the EC said last year - that the EPO would continue to grant software patents that make a technical contribution, despite the European parliament's decision to reject the software patent directive.

The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII), which has doggedly campaigned against software patents in Europe, was confused at the EC's change of tune.

Pieter Hintjens, the president of the FFII said on Wednesday: "I'm stunned. Does the Commission now accept that the EPC rules do actually rule? Or have I misunderstood something?"

In the past, software patent campaigners have expressed concerns that the Community Patent legislation would be used by the EC to legalise software patents.

The EC's statement was made in response to a question posed by a Polish MEP, Adam Gierek, in April. Gierek asked whether the Community Patent legislation would ratify the EPO's current practice of granting software patents.

Gierek said: "I am concerned about European Patent Office practices which are undermining the social acceptability of the patent system, with patents being granted for solutions that are not patentable under the current law. Does the Commission still stand by the position set out in... the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent, namely that the case law which the EPO developed for the European patent will apply to the Community patent?"

Even if the Community Patent legislation does allow software patents to be invalidated in court, this is not enough, according to the FFII's Hintjens. The EPO should offer an independent appeal process, rather than forcing companies to pursue a costly legal case at the European Court of Justice (ECJ), he said.

Hintjens added: "The proposed Community Patents will be granted by the EPO: a non-accountable, non-Community organisation, with no independent appeal possible. The Commission says this is not a problem since the ECJ can invalidate the granted patents in infringement cases.

"That is however only true if it comes to civil litigation, which is often too expensive for SMEs, forcing them to pay for a licence. Therefore software patents not yet taken to court will impose an enormous burden on the industry."

Ingrid Marson writes for ZDNet UK

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Francisco Mingorance

    While articulating the confusion in certain quarters regarding the scope of a future Community Patent Regulation, this article makes a factually correct statement (regarding Article 28.1(a) of the Community Patent Convention) but draws the wrong conclusions.

    The draft Community Patent Regulation would bar from patentability computer programs "as such", just as the European Patent Convention (‘EPC’) currently does under its Article 52. Further, EPC Article 52 is already reproduced in the national laws of most if not all of EU member states laws.

    If the draft Community patent Regulation is adopted in its current form, its Article 28.1(a) simply confirms that patents granted for a subject matter (such as computer programs), which is excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 52 of the EPC, may be invalidated in a relevant court proceeding.
    So why distort the facts and make all this fuss when there is... nothing new ?

    RESPONSE TO:

    Full Article
    Silicon.com
    EC excludes software from patent law
    Patent campaigners shocked by apparent change of stance...
    By Ingrid Marson
    Thursday 25 May 2006

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ