By Andy McCue, 21 November 2006 17:10
NEWS
The trial of a UK technology executive extradited to the US on charges of conspiracy to defraud shareholders has now been delayed until 2008.
Jeremy Crook, a former European VP of US software company Peregrine Systems, was extradited to the US in September after being indicted by a US Grand Jury on fraud charges relating to accounting irregularities at Peregrine.
The indictment alleges that Crook and other Peregrine executives conspired in an accounting fraud and attempted cover-up that led to the software company filing for bankruptcy protection, which wiped $4bn off its share value.
A US federal investigation began in 2002 and Peregrine was then sold to HP in 2005 for $425m after emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Got two seconds?
Make your voice heard - take our latest poll.
Crook denies the charges but if found guilty he could face over 70 years in jail.
Crook left the company in 2001 and was until recently running his own company, but was forced to surrender to US authorities under the UK's controversial extradition treaty with the US. The treaty allows the US to request the extradition of suspects without presenting any of the prosecution evidence in a court first.
The trial had originally been scheduled to take place in April 2007 but Crook's UK lawyer Steve Law told silicon.com the US courts have now adjourned it until the middle of 2008 in order to give Crook time to prepare his defence.
Crook will have to stay in the US at his own expense until the trial takes place, although he is currently awaiting a bail hearing that could allow him to return to the UK for Christmas.
Comments
There are 2 comments. Join the discussion
1. misceng
"Justice delayed is justice denied"
2. Simon
to misceng : you are misguided. The article states that in this case, the delay is to allow the defendant to prepare his case.
However, I cannot see how justice is served by effectively keeping him away from home, presumably without the ability to work, AND expect him to pay his own way !
Of course, had we got a fair and legal extradition treaty with the US, he would still be in the UK while the lawyers prepare a real case for extradition. The current system of "hand him over because we think he probably did something wrong" definitely IS unfair and unjust.