By Graeme Wearden, 2 January 2007 08:30
NEWS
Apple has released new information about its allocation of stock options, defending chief executive Steve Jobs following speculation that a key document had been forged.
In its delayed annual report, published early on Friday, Apple said it would restate its financial results for the last three years and also take a charge of $84m.
Apple also said that while Jobs was "aware [of] or recommended the selection of some favourable grant dates, he did not receive or financially benefit from these grants or appreciate the accounting implications".
Former US vice president Al Gore, chair of the special committee, and Jerome York, chairman of Apple's Audit and Finance Committee, said in a joint statement: "The special committee, its independent counsel and forensic accountants have performed an exhaustive investigation of Apple's stock option-granting practices.
"The board of directors is confident that the company has corrected the problems that led to the restatement, and it has complete confidence in Steve Jobs and the senior management team."
Earlier this week, legal website Law.com claimed federal prosecutors were looking closely at "apparently falsified" stock option documents. Other reports claimed Apple chief executive Steve Jobs had received a grant of 7.5 million share options in 2001 without the required approval from the full Apple board and that documents were subsequently drawn up to suggest the board had approved them.
The allegations have sparked concern Jobs could be forced to resign, robbing Apple of its visionary leader. Apple's stock price has dropped about five per cent this week but it rose by almost three per cent following Friday's announcement.
Earlier this year, one of Apple's former chief financial officers quit the company's board of directors after the internal probe found evidence of some irregularities in stock option allocation.
Almost 200 technology companies have been caught up in the options scandal - including silicon.com publisher CNET Networks - and have been forced to investigate whether stock grants were backdated, a practice in which the grant date of an option is moved to coincide with a low point in the value of a company's shares.
Last week, Juniper Networks admitted it would have to take a $900m charge, while civil and criminal charges have been filed against several former executives of storage vendor Brocade Systems.
Graeme Wearden writes for ZDNet UK
In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.
Log in or create your silicon.com account below