IBM still lording it over patents

Suits you sir...

By Stephen Shankland, 11 January 2007 08:45

NEWS

IBM secured the most US patents last year - something it has done for the past 13 consecutive years.

Big Blue was awarded 3,651 patents in 2006 - a figure which, while not surprising is at least of note in light of various efforts to reform what some say is a flawed system to balance intellectual property (IP) and innovation. Smaller companies eagerly trumpet the award of even a single patent. Meanwhile IBM has shown continued willingness to launch patent infringement lawsuits.

Second place in the patent tally went to Samsung Electronics, with 2,453 patents; followed by Canon with 2,378; Matsushita Electronics with 2,273; HP with 2,113; Intel with 1,962; and Sony with 1,810.

Patents can be a lucrative source of revenue for technology companies that license their IP to others, and can give strategic leverage to competitive negotiations - as in recent deals that Novell and Sun Microsystems signed with rival Microsoft.

But patents can be a pain, too. Amazon.com and IBM are locked in a legal battle about ecommerce patents. A patent infringement suit costs $3m to defend, IP lawyers estimate.

Then there's the open source problem. The collaborative programming community, of which IBM is a significant part, shares technology freely with licensing terms that often are at odds with corporate patent licensing arrangements. IBM has made various attempts to put the open source realm at ease, for example, by sharing some patents with open source projects and pledging to avoid some patent lawsuits.

The latest modest-scale patent reform plan IBM is involved in is an online meeting called the Inventors' Forum where smaller companies or individual inventors can have their say.

Stephen Shankland writes for CNET News.com

Comments

There are 2 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    "A patent infringement suit costs $3m to defend..."

    So what is the point of an individual or small company patenting anything?

    Yet more proof (as if any was needed) that patents are there only to line the pockets of already rich comapnies.

  2. 2. Graham Coles

    Perhaps it's time to stop patenting ideas and restrict the process to actual inventions.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ