By Will Sturgeon, 12 February 2007 16:45
NEWS
With the long-awaited WEEE Directive rolling into full effect later this year - forcing all businesses to address the ways in which they dispose of electrical equipment - companies are being reminded of the option to recycle PCs in the developing world.
Last week silicon.com met up with two charities: one UK-based, Computer Aid International; and one Kenya-based, Computers For Schools Kenya, to see first-hand how this process works.
Speaking at the unveiling of one shipment of computers, Tony Roberts, CEO and founder of Computer Aid International, told silicon.com businesses must consider donating PCs to charities in the developing world.
Roberts said: "We have a duty to ensure other countries can get the benefits of technology which we take for granted."
For companies in the UK this can mean seeking out a charity such as Computer Aid and ensuring PCs can be put to good use, rather than simply chucking them in a skip to end up in landfill. This is still the end-of-life scenario for millions of PCs worldwide each year, according to Roberts. Last month the Green Party also slammed the landfill effect of PC upgrade cycles.
Computer Aid wipes all hard drives to ensure they do not ship with any sensitive data donors may have left on them, and also fully services all kit which meets its Pentium II minimum requirement to ensure it will prove useful in the developing world.
The kit then ships to countries such as Kenya which is currently the focus of much of the work of Computer Aid.
There the monitors, PCs and servers are handed over to partner charity Computers For Schools Kenya (CFSK), based in the grounds of Starehe Boys' Centre, a school in the heart of Nairobi. The kit is checked, software such as Windows 2000 and Office 2000 is installed and then the systems are forwarded on to the next school in line to receive a fully equipped computer suite.
Edwin Martins, a Peace Corps volunteer now working for CFSK, said the charity will work with schools to ensure teachers are trained, classroom space is set aside and an electricity supply is in place so computers are not wasted. To date more than 2,000 teachers have been trained in IT, according to Tom Musili, executive director of CFSK. The charity will regularly service and maintain the 7,000 computers they have placed in more than 300 schools all over Kenya.
CFSK also works with schools to establish up-to-date curriculum, replacing often long-outdated text books with far more relevant and challenging course materials. The widespread adoption of thin client computing as well as cached web pages on a server within the network means they can get the most out of lower spec machines as well as provide an experience of 'nearly live' internet access to PCs in many parts of the country that don't have direct net access. The networked environment also allows students to share files and use email to communicate with one another.
Speaking at Ndururumo secondary school in Nyahururu, a seven-hour drive into the highlands north of Nairobi, one pupil told delegates from the UK that Kenyans must understand technology and be able to use computers if they are to avoid being left behind by galloping Western economies.
She said: "Technology is at the heart of everything in business now and we must know how to use computers in order to bring jobs and money to our country. Hopefully when we leave school we will be as advanced as children in many other countries."
Other pupils at Ndururumo reiterated their understanding of how fundamental a part of business it is now to understand email, the internet and basic productivity tools.
One pupil said previously many of them had thought a computer was "a television connected to a piano" but knew little of what practical uses it might have. Now they are confident using apps such as word processors and spreadsheet software as well as accessing the internet and using email.
Adan Mohammed, managing director of Barclays Bank in Kenya, said it is vital companies do not waste resources that could be beneficial to African schools in closing the digital divide.
Barclays Bank has already donated 1,000 PCs to CFSK for that very reason, said Mohammed, and he urged other companies to follow suit.
CSFK's Martins denied critics' suggestions that donating PCs is simply a way to pass the buck and burden of recycling onto the developing world, reiterating the useful life the machines have before their real end-of-life scenario is played out. Even then, he said, countries such as Kenya are far better equipped to extract value from supposedly obsolete kit. (You can find out more in our photo story, here.)

Comments
There are 10 comments. Join the discussion
1. John McCreesh
This model is absurd. The cost of the software licences shipped with these PCs exceeds the annual family incomes of the recipients.
What is the logic in using charitable donations to generate profits for western software companies?
2. Pat Mason
I support the idea in principle but unfortunately most charities such as Computer Aid expect donors to pay the cost of collecting surplus equipment, and the cost can exceed the landfill charge therefore businesses with an eye on the bottom line (including the public sector where I work) will take the cheapest option to meet budgets.
3. Paul Lefrere
I explored this for a major company keen to see its OS and office software re-installed on recycled PCs. The results were surprising. Recycling as in this article imposed high running costs on "beneficiaries" in Africa, leading to a high total cost of ownership (TCO). The TCO was lower for new-technology schemes such as the "$100 laptop" pioneered by MIT's Negroponte. This is now on the agenda of activist groups. CIOs should think carefully before donating PCs for recycling, and be sure that they have good answers for the questions about end-user TCO that activists are starting to ask in PLC shareholder meetings.
4. Brian Murray
Agree completely with John's comment, in so much as we should really be promoting an open source model to allow for future technology adoption to be vendor independant. Why would we support Microsofts longterm marketing campaign? This is not only silly, but also very suspicious.
However, this is a long way removed from making the whole model absurd. In terms of supporting technology adoption it seems like an excellent alternative to 'the skip' approach - with two vital considerations:
(1) this is NOT an alternative to changing the way we, and eventually the third world, use and dispose! We must retain a focus on reduction inline with the ability to re-use/recycle.
(2) we need to coduct these schemes hand-in-hand with some form of education and assurance that these countries adopt environmentally sound practices.
5. B K Soni
As a matter of Corporate Social Responsibility and for the upliftment of the under privileged, I request the organised sector to come forward voluntarily to support the cause.
Infotrek Syscom Limited
www.infotreksys.com
e-exchangeindia.com
6. Richard Davies
I think that this type of aid is a good idea. Most PC's will have an OEM OS on it anyway and I wouldn't imagine that charities are paying full price for COTS packages such as MS Office!
We throw out PC's when really there is plenty of life left in them i.e. there just not so cutting edge anymore!
For this reason I think its great that they get passed on for others to get benifit from.
7. David Sogan
We commend your article which is asking more companies to donate their computers for reuse in Africa.
4,500 of the computers received by CFSK including all those that have been provided by Barclays Bank have been provided by the UK charity, Digital Links International. Digital Links has a strategic partnership with Barclays in East Africa called "inspiring education through ICT" which will provide refurbished computers to 500 schools in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania.
Digital Links is also pioneering the end of life recycling of computers from Africa, so that there is no lasting environmental impact from the use of refurbished computers. Over 800 computers, which have reached the end of their useful life in Kenya will be removed from CFSK for recycling in the UK in April.
For more details go to www.digital-links.org
8. J Crolla
My main concern over shipping tens of thousands of "end of life" PC's overseas is environmental. Has anyone stopped to think, in this age of green agendas, the impact that these older inefficient pieces of equipment have on the power needs of the nations they go to and how that power is generated? I am all for bridging the gap between the nations of the world but at what cost? Perhaps we should stop to think before we all pat ourselves on the back for disposing of our unwanted kit in this "ethical" way.
(Ed note. You don't appear to be suggesting a viable alternative John. Feel free to share your insight and ideas rather than just criticisms.)
9. Venkatesh
I see a point of recycling the used PCs, but what is most important in the present context is that, open source is the heart for all of us and i'd appreciate such initiatives with the present one.
10. Mridula Swamy
I would like to get more insight on the software provided - is it licensed software or pirated versions? In countries like India, it would be easy to upgrade most software because pirated versions are so easily available. Even some large-scale ICTD projects in the country have to use pirated software as the costs of providing legitimate software in so many machines is so prohibitively high.
If the represenatives of Computer Aid are anyway investing in upgrading the comps and training teachers, then why not install Linux or open source software on the comps? It is much more economical and can create new development possibilities if an entire generation grows up familiar with open source platforms rather than proprietal software.
Also, I share the concern about the cost and environmental implications of shipping close-to-outdated PCs to poor countries. When I was in the US, some of my friends were interested in donating their old PCs to a school in India. But when I inquired about the shipping process, I found that the customs duty to be paid on receiving a used comp in India from abroad is SO high, that it doesn't justify the costs. It made more sense to just buy a new PC in India for the price paid as customs duty.
So.. reusing is an excellent idea, but there should be more efforts to keep it within countries, where for ex., PCs from US companies are used in US schools, and PCs from Indian companies are used in Indian schools. Simultaneously, local producers of low-end, cheaper and robust computers in developing countries should be encouraged, because they can best meet the demand. Even poor women without any tech background can be trained to assemble/ make these kinds of machines, as has been seen in Kerala, India.
I'll stop!