By Steven Musil, 22 February 2007 08:15
NEWS
Apple and Cisco Systems have settled the trademark-infringement lawsuit over the use of the iPhone name for Apple's new multimedia phone.
The agreement allows Apple and Cisco to use the iPhone brand on their own products. Also, the companies said they would explore opportunities for interoperability in the areas of security, consumer and business communications.
The brief announcement made no reference to any financial agreement or specified how the two companies might work together. Representatives for Apple and Cisco declined to comment further, citing confidentiality restrictions.
Cisco sued Apple for trademark infringement in January after Apple unveiled its long-awaited multimedia phone called the iPhone, a name claimed by the network equipment maker. Cisco also charged in its complaint that Apple had attempted to get rights to the iPhone name several times but after Cisco refused the company created a front company to try to acquire the rights another way, according to the lawsuit.
Cisco obtained the iPhone trademark in 2000 when it acquired Infogear, a small start-up that developed consumer devices that allowed people to easily access the internet without a PC. Infogear had actually registered the iPhone trademark in March 1996.
Cisco's home networking division, Linksys, has been using the iPhone trademark on a new family of voice over IP phones since early last year, Cisco said. In December, Linksys expanded the iPhone family with additional products.
The two companies had been in extended negotiations to settle the lawsuit, and a second extension of the talks was set to expire yesterday.
The iPhone, which Steve Jobs unveiled in January at the Macworld Expo, will allow users to listen to music, make phone calls, send text messages and email, surf the web, and take and upload photos. It's expected to be available in the US on Cingular's network starting in June and will come in two versions, a 4GB model for $499 and an 8GB model for $599.
Steven Musil writes for CNET News.com
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Sarah
What a cop out.
Cisco should have taken Apple to the cleaners for their arrogance of thinking that despite Cisco's ownership of the iPhone name, they could just blatantly ignore patent law and just use it anyway.
Either that or the US Justice department should fine Apple for the blatant attempt to ignore patent law.
Just another reason not to buy Apple products.