By Tim Ferguson, 5 July 2007 09:01
NEWS
Tech companies will have to work harder for their customers' cash as companies spend a greater proportion of their budgets on in-house IT projects.
A report from market analysis group Datamonitor suggests although tech budgets are on the rise, companies believe they get better value and faster results by investing in-house.
Aphrodite Brinsmead, analyst at Datamonitor and author of the report, said businesses currently spend around a third of their tech budget on internal IT initiatives.
She explained the IT department is often the first choice for addressing tech needs as companies chase cost effectiveness and efficiency.
She said IT decision-makers believe tasks can be carried out more quickly in-house as staff are already on the spot and have better knowledge of the business.
Brinsmead added vendors need to work hard for business and target areas where economies and IT budgets are strong.
The research found financial service and utilities companies are most likely to increase their IT budgets, with more than half of those questioned across the sectors saying their budgets will increase in 2008.
Postcards from the bleeding edge
Read the latest missive from tech guru and silicon.com columnist, Peter Cochrane, as he blogs from around the world.
But Datamonitor predicts the proportion of expenditure on hardware is likely to decrease. This is due to increasingly complex IT infrastructures and the fact vendors are promoting their services, according to analysts.
Around the world, Italian companies are the most likely to approach tech vendors for help before their own IT department while Benelux and Australian companies are most likely to stay in-house.
The Understanding IT budget trends H1 2007 report quizzed 500 IT decision makers in Australia, the UK and the US.
Comments
There are 2 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
Govt policy once again backfires! In the UK the Govt has given IP rights to Universities doing research, even though it has already been paid for with our money. This means higher costs to industry, long negotiating times, and unrealistic royalty expectations. There is a risk-reward imbalance - all the exploitation risk lies with industry, the University wants up-front risk-free fees. On more example of the Law of Unintended Consequences at work.
2. Nick Cole
Government policy is always several years behind the rest of the world! Probably based on the need to convince not just senior management but politicians whose pet projects, narrow focus, or inability to think holistically precludes them from really thinking ahead.
It is a no-brainer to realise that in-house people will know the business better than anyone outside. This doesn't mean the outsiders cannot contribute but they need to be managed by an effective and knowledgable in-house team.