By Tim Ferguson, 8 May 2008 15:37
NEWS
The opening day problems at Heathrow's Terminal 5 (T5) were largely down to a lack of staff familiarisation with new facilities and processes, rather than technology issues.
That's according to British Airways CEO, Willie Walsh, who has made it clear building work delays caused the airline to compromise its staff familiarisation programme.
All the tech at Heathrow T5
Video: Heathrow T5's cutting-edge baggage tech
Video: Heathrow Terminal 5 uncovered
Photos: Passenger's eye view of Heathrow Terminal 5
Photos: Inside Heathrow's Terminal 5
Photos: Heathrow's Terminal 5 comes alive
Photos: Technology at the heart of Terminal 5
Walsh was being quizzed by the parliamentary Transport Committee which is looking into the opening day chaos and subsequent problems at the terminal.
He said: "My regret is that we did compromise on the testing programme. Our staff weren't as familiar as they should have been and that impacted on their performance."
Walsh added: "We were aware that aspects of the building were not complete. If I was to do that again, I would not compromise on that testing and familiarisation."
Walsh admitted there were issues with the baggage system software but added this wasn't the main factor which caused the situation to escalate.
In the written evidence submitted to the committee, BA said: "A number of the issues were caused by the incorrect setup of the system for live operation by BAA or its contractors and by unexpected software errors."
Walsh said: "A number of software problems were solved in the first four days. It would be wrong to say it was solely to do with the software."
He added the situation was exacerbated by a number of problems occurring at the same time, including car park access and staff security search delays.
He made it clear there is room for tech improvement, saying greater server capacity is needed to cope with the quantity of data produced by the various systems in the terminal.
But he added: "If I was to pick on one issue which I would address if we did it again, it would be [lack of staff familiarisation]. I think that's a lesson we should have recognised at the time and certainly recognise now."
Walsh also restated that the buck stops with him but stood firm when asked why he remained BA CEO. "I've made it absolutely clear I have no intention of resigning," he said.
Also in the hot seat was BAA CEO, Colin Matthews, who - although not acting as CEO at the time of T5's opening - has had to deal with the fallout since his official start date on 1 April.
Matthews admitted BAA made mistakes: "Some of the problems were undoubtedly down to BAA and some were not. Clearly with hindsight, there were aspects that weren't ready. There are no excuses."
But he was positive about the future for T5. "I believe Terminal 5 is now back on track. I believe that Terminal 5 will be judged a success," he said.
Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. David W Lucas
"Tech Not to Blame". What a perfect joke. What a textbook example of the 'old' attitude to technology, the 19th/20th century viewpoint, that of the tech somehow being apart from the people who operate it.
Some of the more enlightened engineering companies (think big defence projects) now routinely apply a rigorous 'systems engineering' approach to problems this big. The fundamental point is that no matter how whiz-bang the tech is (hard system), the people operating it and being processed by it, along with other imponderables (soft systems) must be considered in the specification and design from DAY 1, otherwise the systems outcome is the weird emergent chaos that we witnessed at T5. It's common sense, really.
2. Simon Allen
So, what he is ACTUALLY saying is that the building was delivered late and they did not change the opening date.
How many times have I been in project meetings, complaining that we did not have stable power, dust-free environment, site access, lifts to get the equipment up to the floors etc. and that we could not meet out dates - only to be told that the opening date would not change and we would just have to get it done.
However, 99% of people will still think it was the technology as that was what was said at the time.
3. Paul Mackenzie Ross
Didn't anyone ask Willie Walsh if he knew the 5(6) Ps before they took him onboard? Even the most ill-paid techies know that Perfect Planning Prevents (P***) Poor Performance.
4. anonymous
My project management skills may be not as good as the 'clever' people at BA and BAA, but the management-speak mumbo-jumbo of 'staff familiarity', in my book, is commonly termed 'training' and 'orientation'.
5. A non-B.A. flyer
Good to see that none of the problems are due to the new technology, or to management failures (the 6 Ps) but all the fault of the staff not being familiar with the technology, new procedures etc. Now who could possibly be to blame for that? Oh, could that actually be management?