By Julian Goldsmith, 14 July 2008 12:54
NEWS
The cost of complying with the EU Payments Services Directive (PSD) could amount to €6bn over the next 18 months for 30 of the biggest international banks in Europe.
FS Cheat Sheets
♦ Basel II
♦ MiFID
♦ Sarbanes-Oxley
The EU PSD, approved in December 2007 and due to come into force in November 2009, is designed to simplify and clarify payments transactions and open them up to new market entrants across the Euro zone. One of the effects will be to speed up payments in the same way as the Faster Payments regulations already in force in the UK.
According to a report from analysts at PSE Consulting, from the responses of 30 leading international banking organisations, more than 50 per cent of the sample believe the cost to them of complying with PSD may reach €10m each. Just under one in 10 said it could exceed €100m.
Half of the banks surveyed said they had completed impact assessments on PSD but 85 per cent said no budget has yet been allocated for compliance costs. Just under a third are worried about their own organisation's IT systems' abilities to cope with the changes demanded by the directive. Two-thirds said they had not broached the subject with their IT suppliers.
In a statement, a spokesman for legal firm Sidley Austin said: "Implementation of the PSD is only 18 months away. Medium and smaller banks and non-banks must begin assessing its impact or many may not be ready by the deadline."

Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Martin Macmillan, Level Four Software
Unlike SEPA, the PSD is enforceable by law and therefore causing banks a huge amount of stress and, as this research suggests, financial burden. The high implementation cost could be because the PSD will impact multiple banking channels in subtly different ways, making the overall process a daunting task. Because of this, it is possible that some channels will be neglected - past implementations of regulatory initiatives have shown that the ATM is often left until the last minute as the forgotten channel. EMV roll-out good example of how this can occur with the ATM channel, resulting in banks scrambling to reach compliance.
It is vital that banks find solutions to comply with the PSD now by evaluating how it will impact every banking channel (including the ATM), but this isn't being made easy by the scope to interpret the Directive in different ways. The ability to opt-in/opt-out on how various points need to be implemented will doubtless increase the complexity of PSD compliance further.
Hopefully banks may use the PSD changes that affect the ATM as an opportunity to innovate at the channel (and bring their most frequently used customer touch-point out of the dark ages), rather than just do the bare minimum to keep on the right side of the regulations. Somehow, in these hard times, I suspect they won't...