Jobs of the future: No office, no paycheque

Get ready to be flexible...

By Mark Kobayashi-Hillary, 8 October 2008 11:47

COMMENT

As technology changes how we do business, the way we work is morphing as well. Mark Kobayashi-Hillary gets a glimpse into the future…

I just wrote a book called Who Moved My Job?. It's an exploration of how three border collies on an English farm manage to find new jobs when their previously tenured positions are usurped by foreign herding dogs - from China, India and Poland.

Naturally the book should be taken with a pinch of salt but it intends to ask the question: how are jobs going to change in the future?

Over the past decade, the internet has moved from a technical dream to a robust business infrastructure, spawning a new era of tech-centric companies - and fundamentally changing the rules of business and work for everyone.

More on outsourcing…

♦ Gov't stung by 'rip-off' outsourcing deals

♦ Shell signs $4bn IT outsourcing contract

♦ Cloud computing – the data centre of the future?

♦ Tough bargaining forces outsourcing price cuts

♦  Profile: Nandan Nilekani, co-chairman, Infosys

♦  India losing status as offshore king?

♦ Productivity gains driving IT outsourcing

♦ Tax payer still owed millions by EDS

♦ Cheat Sheet: Offshoring

♦ Special Report: Inside India

JP Rangaswami, managing director of BT Design, says over time we will all have more than one role. "My father had one job. By the time I retire I will have had maybe seven. My son will also have seven… at the same time."

He continues: "The job of tomorrow will resemble belonging to multiple social networks, with value exchanged for value provided."

Sounds scary - if you think a job should be a big employer paying the little guy a regular salary whether he works hard, or slumps at a desk with a hangover.

Andy Mulholland, global chief technology officer of Capgemini, believes the status quo will change and the daily commute will disappear: "Workers offering the right expertise will become detached from a set location. Whilst today an office provides the necessary facilities and environment to work in, the future will see far more variation. Green and cost factors alone suggest that the trend to working from home, or maybe a local facility hired for the day is well under way."

Those regular monthly pay cheques may also become a thing of the past.

He said: "This break with the present basis of employment based on location and time will see considerable change in the job contracts of the future, even for procedural operations. The question is, will these jobs become 'task'-oriented and paid according to time taken or instead increasingly 'value'-oriented and paid for by results?"

These are the same trends we are seeing in the world of outsourcing today.

Companies are less keen to pay for a fixed number of resources by the day - they want to agree on a price for a piece of work regardless of the underlying effort. From what these company chiefs are saying, it looks like the job itself may drift into this paradigm, with companies only prepared to pay for what you deliver.

Marc Vollenweider serves an example of how we might work in future. The CEO of research and knowledge firm Evalueserve, he is Swiss, lives in Singapore - having recently moved there from Austria - and most of his team are based in India. Everyone who works for him uses Skype to keep in touch.

It's no surprise Vollenweider believes anyone seeking a job now has to be flexible.

He says: "Jobs in future will demand flexibility, telecommuting will be normal with technology facilitating compliance to standards, and it will be essential to communicate well and to understand the nature of a multicultural society."

Training will have to be an ongoing process, as it is in IT now but not in all industries. "I estimate that you need to focus at least 10 per cent of your time on learning, just to stay ahead," he says.

Martyn Hart, chairman and founder of the National Outsourcing Association, believes changes are already taking place in the workplace. "There is an increasing pressure on organisations to change the cost of intra-company services and staff costs to be variable as opposed to fixed, enabling organisations to scale up and down much more easily as business ebbs and flows. This is likely to have a massive impact on people's job definitions.

"For a start, as the propensity of outsourcing and shared service centres grows, the prevalence of in-house service jobs, like accountancy, HR administration and IT will grow less and less. Professionals who work in these areas will be more likely to work for outsourcing suppliers of these services."

That's a trend we have all seen develop in the IT space, and one which is now drifting into other professions.

Hart believes this change is not all bad though. Working for specialist suppliers, he says, "means that employees work for different organisations, which will add a more varied dimension to their role".

The Irish business writer Charles Handy wrote extensively about the way our jobs are changing. In fact, he wrote some of his most accurate predictions - such as the way companies will use fewer permanent employees and more agency staff - way back in the 1980s.

He also described companies as being made up of three parts: core employees, project experts and casual staff - much like what we see today.

It appears to be the beginning of the end for the job as permanent contract between employer and employed.

But it's not without precedent: before the modern-day company came along we all needed skills we could trade to earn a living. As the modern company changes beyond recognition, the concept of a job has to change too.

Mark Kobayashi-Hillary is the author of Who Moved My Job? and a director of the National Outsourcing Association.

Comments

There are 6 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Drew stephenson

    I guess the question that goes with this though is how long will it take for the institutional mechansisms of the country to catch up? How will the tax man track someone who claims to hold multiple primary jobs? How does the credit agency deal with someone who has had 18 jobs in two years and currently holds 7 - none of which are long term? How do those who don't live in a highly connected city fit into this new environment? Interesting stuff but i think the future market will be constrained by external factors for a long while yet

  2. 2. Mark Kobayashi-Hillary

    I agree with your comment. Income tax is a major issue regarding this because the system assumes a single primary income and it can be a nightmare to deal with multiple sources of income - without creating an umbrella company to handle it. Ideally we need an extension of consumption tax, so taxation is turned around, but don't hold your breath...

  3. 3. Tim Jackson

    The concept that employers should protect workers from the vagaries of the real world is as obscene as the insurance industry. It gives rise to a distorted image of reality and to behaviour designed to exploit others rather than to create wealth.

    Small businesses have been dealing with the tax man on a reasonably friendly basis for just about ever, keeping accounts is not rocket science, just ask your local plumber or greengrocer how it's done. Mostly they use computers, but I suppose that is beneath most IT people. :(

    I speak as one who moved in the 1980s from an office IT job to self employment, working from home and selling myself by the hour. Yes I have an "umbrella company", but that is largely historical, it isn't much advantage these days.

    I don't enjoy the fact that my customers want to dump all the risk in a project on me, but that's life (after all employees dump all the risk on the employer in the same way) and I price my services accordingly. It means if I do my job efficiently and my costings accurately I make more profit, which encourages me to make the effort.

  4. 4. Michael King

    Am I already in the job of the future? I have no office, I get no paycheque: twelve months ago it was called redundancy now its called unemployment. Anyone want/need a mature VC++ programmer?

  5. 5. Radical Meldrew

    There is an underlying malevolence to this vision of the future. Not everyone wants to be an entrepreneur or possesses the ability to carry it off successfully. Some people will simply be left behind to flounder in the mire of their own discontent, cursing their bad luck. Ditching non-essential staff and outsourcing their tasks will undoubtedly lead to multiple agencies willing to provide these specialised services - The agencies will almost become clones of the former employers, oh, with the exception of staff benefits which will be absent of course.
    JP Rangwaswami is a profound thinker but I'm afraid this vision is a 'from the top' perspective and only would only work well for qualified professionals and skilled tradesmen......maybe he should get out more?
    PS: That may prove to be difficult with seven jobs to hold down!

  6. 6. Richard

    There is one potential problem associated with this working method and that is potential breaches in confidentiality which may occur, even if by accident when a single person is doing similar work for multiple companies. Let alone the potential for deliberate commercial espionage.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ