By Andy McCue, 31 January 2006 16:10
NEWS
The government ID cards bill has suffered two more defeats in the House of Lords after peers voted in favour of further amendments to the proposed legislation.
The report stage of the ID cards bill in the House of Lords was completed on Monday with peers voting for the ID card watchdog to be appointed by the Crown instead of the Home Secretary and for the watchdog to report to parliament and not the Home Secretary.
A final reading of the ID cards bill will now take place in the House of Lords next week before it returns to the House of Commons, where the government is expected to ask MPs to reject the amendments made by the Lords over the last two weeks.
During the final report stage of the bill on Monday, Home Office minister Baroness Scotland of Asthal said transsexuals awaiting a sex-change operation will be issued with two ID cards, one for their birth gender and one for their post-op gender.
The Lords have already inflicted major defeats on the government by voting to block the ID cards bill until the costs have been scrutinised by parliamentary watchdog, the National Audit Office, and by making it voluntary for people to enrol on the national ID register.
See silicon.com's ongoing award-winning ID Cards on Trial campaign for all the latest developments on the government's controversial proposals.
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Karen Challinor
I can't see the transgendered getting a second card for free, so those at the poor end of the pay scale will suffer even more
and if a retina scan, or fingerprints are used to search the database will it return both records, along with all the false positives
that is assuming that two sets of records are made, as there is no reason to put a transgender flag on everyones records
also according to recent legislation it is illegal to disclose a persons transgendered status without their permission, so checking someones identity will need to be done in private by authorised personell only
also industry will have to be denied access to the database for checking job applicant identities, just in case the applicant is transgendered as this is none of their business
shot themselves in the foot there I think