By Graeme Wearden, 12 July 2006 08:55
NEWS
The government is re-evaluating its ID cards project as part of a wider review of the Home Office's activities.
Home Secretary John Reid launched the review soon after taking up his post in May, following a series of controversies over the immigration service.
The Home Office confirmed on Tuesday the ID cards project, which will involve a massive database of personal and biometric data, will be included in this review.
A Home Office spokeswoman said on Tuesday: "As part of the Home Office review we are ensuring that the sequencing of our plans is coherent and addresses the priorities of British citizens as the Home Secretary has identified. We have always made clear that its introduction would be an incremental process. That remains the position."
This comes just days after the apparent leaking of internal Home Office emails, in which senior staff appeared to warn that the project, currently estimated by the government to carry a £5.8bn price tag, could be in serious trouble.
Some reports on Tuesday claimed the planned launch date of 2008 may have to be pushed back as a result of the review, with Computer Weekly reporting that tendering for the programme has been delayed until at least the end of this year.
However, the Home Office denied the ID cards tenders were now on ice. A spokeswoman said: "As far as I know, it's going ahead."
Opponents of the ID cards scheme argue it will be extremely difficult and expensive to implement, and that the underlying biometric technology is not reliable enough. There are also concerns the central database of personal and biometric information could be hacked.
The London School of Economics (LSE) warned last year that the total cost of the ID cards scheme could reach £20bn.
Dr Edgar Whitley, research co-ordinator for the LSE Identity Project, on Tuesday said: "The delays to the ID cards scheme announced today come as no surprise to LSE's Identity Project team: our 300-page report last year warned the government that its proposals were high risk.
"Given repeated statements from Home Office ministers about detailed costings and clear plans for the scheme we are alarmed at the extent of the problems revealed over the past few days."
And following the publication of the leaked emails last Sunday, the No2ID pressure group claimed the programme "has been built on deception".
Phil Booth, No2ID's national co-ordinator, said in a statement: "The government has systematically misled the public, bullied parliament and anyone who dared to speak against them, and wasted tens of millions already on a scheme that officials now admit is unworkable. Now we discover that the whole thing has been rushed, just to fit Tony Blair's political agenda. The government's much-hailed "gold standard" of ID is a complete sham."
Graeme Wearden writes for ZDNet UK
Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
Now there's a surprise - NOT!! When history judges Tony Blair & his government (as he so often talks about) I suspect it will designate it as the most incompetent, venial, secretive cabal of opportunists ever to ruin a country.
2. Mark Hosey
I firmly believe there is a culture of psychosis in the upper echelons of management and government. They cannot admit any wrong and they never show remorse when others suffer as a result of their actions. They always hold on to their ill conceived ideas till the bitter end, theirs or ours, regardless of any professionally sound advice to the contrary. God help us all!
3. Dr John Wright
We won't even get involved in issues relating to "confidentiality" of the held data?
As we are currently constructing a relatively similar database for the NHS, should not, with adequate sequrity of clinical data and, where appropriate, of "personal data" proceed in tandem?
It would seem a logical approach and, because of that very fact, won't occur in that way - c'est la plume c'est la meme choise?
4. John Robinson
I think the anonymous poster from Poole meant "venal" (meaning corruptible) rather than "venial" (meaning easily forgiven). If she (or he) did, I tend to agree with her (or him); I certainly won't easily forgive much of what this government has done in the last 5 years or so.
5. anonymous
I have watched the saga on ID cards unfold ever since their conception and have yet to see a justified business case to support introducing them. Civil servants should take responsibility for once and stop wasting mine and other taxpayers' money.