Sheep ID tags to combat disease outbreaks

Ear, fancy that...

By Natasha Lomas, 19 December 2007 10:50

NEWS

Electronic tagging of sheep will be mandatory for UK farmers from 31 December 2009 as part of a European Union ruling to help combat disease outbreaks such as foot and mouth.

The EU regulations require sheep in the UK to have electronic tags by the end of 2009, except those intended for slaughter before they reach 12 months of age - though this is a two-year extension on the previous deadline of 1 January 2008.

Although the regulations apply to sheep and goats, the UK has fewer than 160,000 goats - meaning it will be able to utilise a derogation on complying with part of the regulation, according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

The EID (electronic identification) tags are being brought in across Europe following the outbreak of Foot and Mouth disease in the UK in 2001. The European Commission hopes EID will improve disease control by enabling individual animals' movements to be traced effectively throughout their lifetime.

Failure to be able to trace animals quickly and effectively during a disease outbreak could mean the number of cases of disease is greater, the outbreak takes longer to control and the cost of eliminating it is higher, says the EC. It could also mean greater movement restrictions have to be placed on the industry - a situation farmers are keen to avoid.

But electronic tagging is a controversial issue for farmers owing to the added cost per animal they would have to absorb. EID tags are more expensive than basic number-stamped tags.

Earlier this year the government said the current estimate of the total annual cost to UK markets and slaughterhouses for electronically tagging breeding sheep was £1.14m, while the cost of tagging all sheep was £1.84m. The bill for UK farmers will also run into the millions but the government says the cost will come down as technologies improve and economies of scale are exploited.

Following the EU ruling, Defra's animal welfare minister, Jeff Rooker, said in a statement: "Whilst I am aware that the industry needs to make significant changes in order to implement these proposals, securing a delay until 31 December 2009 for implementation is a significant achievement and will give our industry two years longer than was originally agreed to adjust to the introduction of EID.

"We do still have concerns about the cost and practicalities of introducing EID and these are recognised in the Commission's report. We will continue to work in close partnership with industry to discuss the implementation of EID in a way which is practical and industry can make work. We will also be seeking further amendments to the regulation to limit the impact of the introduction of the individual recording requirements which exists for older animals."

Comments

There are 4 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    ID tags are only going to be manditory for farm owned sheep, what about the sheep owned by private individuals as "lawn mowers", should these not be tagged as well.

    How about tagging all animals, after all that would make the chip makers even more money.

    Better still ban sheep!!!

  2. 2. Adam cainer

    Wouldn't it be easier to Baa-code them?

  3. 3. Richard Webber

    It is pleasing to see that Jeff Rooker is looking for amendments to the regulation.
    The most ludicrous of which is WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get) This system promotes same number replacement tags for sheep which I have calculated will cost the industry an extra £40m per year than if they had gone for a random numbered system which would allow farmers to replace lost tags at the time of the finding of the loss.
    This stupid WYSIWYG system means that every farmer will now have to re gather sheep to put replacement tags in once they have arrived from the manufacturer.
    Added to this it seems no one realises the effect that compromising the elctronic number will have. WYSIWYG will not only cost farmers dear but it will also stop any ambition of realising a real time database for disease control.
    A great pity that those representing member states did not understand the make up of the electronic number when they decided on the regulation back in the Autumn of last year.
    Why should EU sheep farmers pay for incompetence of those representing us at that time?

  4. 4. Ruth

    You do realise that they are only using the sheep to practise on, preparatory to tagging us all?

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ