Accenture and BAE Systems abandon ID cards

Â…for "commercial reasons"

By Nick Heath, 25 January 2008 11:05

NEWS

Two major IT suppliers have pulled out of the bidding for lucrative contracts to build the systems underpinning the UK's national biometric ID card project.

Silicon.com's A to Z of ID Cards

Click on the links below to find out everything you ever needed to know about the government's ID card plans...

A is for Act
B is for Biometrics
C is for Compulsory
D is for Data privacy worries
E is for EDS
F is for Forgery
G is for Government IT
H is for Home Office
I is for Identity and Passport Service
J is for Jury
K is for Hong Kong
L is for London School of Economics
M is for Money
N is for National Identity Register
O is for Other cards
P is for Passports
Q is for Quarter
R is for Refuseniks
S is for Self-destruct
T is for Terrorist
U is for Utility bill
V is for Verification
W is for When
X is for Xenophobia
Y is for Young people
Z is for London Zoo

Both Accenture and BAE Systems have withdrawn from the procurement process for contracts to build the national identity register and the biometric ID cards.

Both companies cited commercial reasons, with a spokesman for BAE Systems saying it did not feel its bid could deliver "the customer requirement".

Their withdrawal leaves only six major suppliers CSC, EDS, Fujitsu, IBM, Steria and Thales in the running to be chosen to tender for the contracts in March.

The Home Office said the procurement process is on schedule and that it will award the framework contract to five potential suppliers in May.

The first contracts to be awarded will be for the replacement of the core application and enrolment processes for passports, together with the provision of desktop infrastructure for the Identity and Passport Service. And also the replacement and upgrading of systems for fingerprint matching and storage in connection with immigration and visa requirements and transition to the replacement service.

A spokesman for Accenture said: "We did an evaluation of commercial and other aspects and decided not to continue in pursuit of the framework."

A spokesman for BAE Systems explained the reasons for leaving the process and said: "It is for commercial reasons. We bid and decided that at this stage it did not contain every element necessary to deliver the customer requirement."

The system has been criticised this week following revelations in leaked draft Home Office documents that the widespread rollout of ID cards could be pushed back to 2012 and that teenagers could be required to have the cards to open a bank account.

Comments

There are 3 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Karen Challinor

    so thats two down and three to go is it ?

    and if only one bids does that mean they automatically get the contract regardless of how much their bid is ?

    personally I seriously doubt any bidder can 'deliver "the customer requirement"' mainly because the customer (HMG) has only the vaguest idea what it is asking for and everyone who has contributed to the specification has their own idea of what the scheme will comprise consequently the project is so broad and ill defined no one can deliver it

  2. 2. anonymous

    Smart companies, or at least smarter than this government who should follow their lead and abandon the whole ID Card scheme.
    Some contracts are just not worth it and this one would certainly wreck their reputations. It is immensely difficult to put a commercial price on a company’s reputation. These companies have far too much else to lose to be concerned with a project that the Government knows is fast turning into a political disaster.

  3. 3. anonymous

    Let us hope that some modicum of common sense and sensitivity to public opinion persuades remaining bidders to over-ride their natural greed...... but I doubt it! No doubt they all have "social responsibility" policies - if so, perhaps they should consider whether assisting in the creation of a police state can be regarded as socially responsible?

    This contract may not be the gravy train they all anticipate!

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ