By Nick Heath, 20 February 2009 17:15
NEWS
Reviews of the controversial ID cards project are to be published after the government lost a four-year-long battle to keep them secret.
The two independent Gateway Reviews into the likely success of the £4.7bn ID cards project, completed in 2003 and 2004, must be published within 28 days.
The publication of the reports was ordered by the Information Tribunal today and is a blow for the government, which had argued it was important they remain confidential to protect future Gateway reviews.
The tribunal's decision comes after anti-ID card campaign group No2ID member, Mark Dziecielewski, won the right to have the reviews published after his Freedom of Information request to see the reports was upheld by the information commissioner in 2006.
The commissioner's decision was supported by the Information Tribunal in 2007 following an appeal by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC). The OGC subsequently appealed the tribunal's verdict in the High Court, which last year overturned the tribunal's decision to publish the reviews.
In its ruling today, the tribunal said there is a public interest argument for the reviews to be published, including analysing the costs.
"There is an undoubted debate as to the merits of the scheme," it added.
Gateway Reviews were introduced in 2000 by the OGC to track the progress of government IT projects.
The tribunal says the names of contributors to the ID cards reviews should not be published and that it does not believe all Gateway Reviews should be published.
An OGC spokesman said: "The Information Tribunal has concluded that neither they nor the information commissioner believe all Gateway Reviews should be disclosed. It has made clear that its decision refers only to this specific request and does not set any precedent. We are currently assessing the detail of the Information Tribunal's decision and will respond in full in due course."
Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. Radical Meldrew
What is the point of these reviews? If they agree with government policy they are no doubt released and quoted as proof of democracy in action. When they don't (which is what we all suspect of the ID card report), they are supressed and hidden. Taking this into consideration I have to question why they are carried out at all.
2. Karen Challinor
I'd like to know how much of the taxpayers money the government gave to the legal profession in their four year bid to suppress the release of these reports
yep they spent OUR money to stop US seeing the reviews, the PM certainly didn't put his hand in his own pocket for this
3. drew stephenson
Following on from Karen's point, i wonder how much money the government has spent challengeing FOI requests since it was introduced?
Worth a question perhaps?
4. Matt
Instead of lying and attempting to rule by fear, why not be more open and honest, people might actually start to respect the people that we as a nation elect as our leaders. Maybe France has the right idea, go on strike to make the Government listen!
5. RM
Perhps we're electing the wrong people?