By Tom Espiner, 24 June 2009 08:50
NEWS
Police data systems should be based on open-source software, according to a senior member of the Association of Chief Police Officers.
Ian Readhead, director of information for Acpo, said on Tuesday at a Unisys security event that emergency service data transferral systems should be open source, to help ensure interoperability between them.
"Perhaps the future isn't about licensing different products," Readhead told silicon.com sister site ZDNet UK. "There will be a need to look at compatibility."
Currently police forces use a patchwork of proprietary and open source systems. The Holmes 2 (Home Office Large Major Enquiry System) police database, which is run on behalf of the police by Unisys, is optimised to run on both Linux and proprietary systems. The police communicate using a mixture of proprietary systems from companies including Airwave, BlackBerry and Orange.
The different police data systems in the UK will increasingly converge, Readhead noted. He believes relying on a single provider for this unified system will not necessarily mean information could be exchanged more efficiently, and would not have business benefits.
"Convergence is not about being with one supplier but about building systems in such a way to move data seamlessly, without sacrificing privacy or security," he said.
Readhead noted that in a fast-evolving situation such as a flood, or following an explosion, emergency services require data systems that can quickly transfer and update information. "The focus needs to be on emergency response and how a whole raft of partner agencies deal with emergencies in a way that transcends data considerations," he said.
He noted that proprietary technology vendors such as Microsoft want to work with an open-source capability. Microsoft develops open source code under its CodePlex project, and distributes it under Microsoft Public License, one of Microsoft's OSI-certified open-source licences.
Comments
There is 1 comment. Join the discussion
1. Simon
Not quite - he seems to be confusing OPen Source with Open Standards, though there is a large correlation between them.
Whether open or closed source software, he is correct that the systems themselves need to be using open data storage and interface standards - that is the way to efficient working.
And Microsoft do not "want" to work with Open Source - they are being forced to by market pressure.