"The idea government should get a blank cheque from us for it is odious"
By Andy McCue
Published: 17 January 2006 12:55 GMT
The government's controversial ID card plans have suffered a major defeat in the House of Lords with peers refusing to approve the bill until a detailed cost breakdown of the scheme is made public.
The House of Lords voted 237 votes against 156 votes in favour of an amendment to the bill that would force ministers to reveal the full ID card costs to the National Audit Office for scrutiny, with MPs then voting again on the bill.
-- Phil Booth, national co-ordinator, No2ID, reacting to the Lords treatment of the ID cards bill
During the vote on Monday evening, the proposed ID cards legislation came under fierce and sustained attack from peers, who echoed concerns raised by silicon.com's ID Cards on Trial campaign over the massive costs and lack of transparency surrounding the scheme.
The Home Office claims the 10-year cost of the ID cards project will be £5.8bn but academics at the London School of Economics (LSE) estimate the real cost is nearer £19bn and that it could even spiral to £30bn.
Lord Peyton of Yeovil said: "There is a widespread anxiety in this House about the lack of information. We are dealing with a comprehensive system of surveillance and the idea government should get a blank cheque from us for it is odious."
Baroness Noakes argued: "This is about transparency and openness in government. I don't think the government has demonstrated that with this bill. There is still a disparity between what the government has put forward and the LSE. We asked other departments for costs and drew a blank. There are unanswered questions there."
The Earl of Erroll, who has a background in computer security and identity management, said the ID cards will provide no benefit to the citizen and joked that people would be more likely to use it to scrape the ice off their car windscreens in winter.
Peers rejected the government's claims that revealing the full costing of the scheme would make it harder to get a better deal from IT suppliers.
The government was also defeated on two other amendments. Peers voted in favour of a guarantee of a secure and reliable method of recording and storing personal information for the ID scheme and for an amendment stopping ID cards being required to access public services.
The House of Lords will consider further amendments to the Identity Cards Bill next week including taking out a key part of the legislation forcing people to register for an ID card when renewing driving licences and passports.
Home Office ministers have already vowed to fight the amendments when the bill comes back to the House of Commons and the legislation is now likely to get bogged down for several months as the amendments 'ping-pong' between peers and MPs.
Phil Booth, national co-ordinator of the No2ID campaign group, hailed it as the first significant victory in parliament for critics and opponents of the bill.
He told silicon.com: "This was a necessary victory. It's the first time the bill has received proper scrutiny. But I don't think the government are hiding the costs; I think they don't actually know them. They are really going to have to pull something out of the hat now."
Read recent commentary on the technology kinks that must be overcome in order to achieve a national implementation of ID cards.
Well done to the Earl of Erroll for finally discov...
Rob G
this is like watching a gambling addict getting an...
Ian Kilpatrick
£19BN or even £30BN, that is frankly a ridiculous ...
Adam Finch
Now we see why they (New Labour) so wanted to dest...
Simon
I am grateful to the House of Lords for trying to ...
Jerrold Baldwin
Ownership of employee staff manual, policies and procedures updating it with new legislation and any amendments required as deemed necessary by the ...
Versed in all things purchasing you should also have a proven ability to analyse financial terms and performance metrics, be familiar with vendor ...
In addition to being voted as the 15th ? Please note: You MUST be eligible to work in the United Kingdom, and if successfully employed, you be ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Nick Heath
Let's shine a light into the public sector IT money pit
With £16bn being spent, why is productivity still falling?
Tim Ferguson
BBC is taking tech seriously, so give it a break!
Auntie is the envy of the world but doesn't get the credit it deserves at home...
Peter Cochrane
Peter Cochrane's Blog: Open info for all?
Government stonewalling citizens
Nick Heath
Home Office CIO on taming tech and why ID cards are good news
Interview: Annette Vernon, Home Office CIO
Nick Heath
NHS records, Google and Microsoft: Where do you want your data?
Politicians: Heal thyself
Alan Hunt
NHS network: Time to get secure
Patient data in need of a check up