Benefits of £12.4bn NPfIT scheme questioned
By Andy McCue
Published: 12 September 2007 15:58 BST
The government's £12.4bn NHS IT project must be subject to an independent external audit to get it back on track and ensure the promised productivity benefits are delivered, Derek Wanless has warned.
Wanless delivered his verdict in a review of the progress made on the recommendations in his original 2002 report on the level of investment needed in the NHS over the next 20 years.
The new report claims that despite the increased level of investment in IT in the health service, the problems and delays with the National Programme for IT (NPfIT) in the NHS have the potential to seriously undermine the productivity gains Wanless envisaged back in 2002.
silicon.com Public Sector
Get the latest public sector news straight to your inbox. Sign up for the PS newsletter today!
The report said: "The extent to which the NHS will benefit from these substantial investments remains unclear."
Wanless said the substantial investment in NHS IT is not being adequately audited and evaluated and that it is difficult to obtain reliable data on NHS resources being committed to NPfIT.
Just £500,000 has so far been spent on evaluation and Wanless said Connecting for Health, the NHS agency responsible for the NPfIT, should be subject to "detailed external scrutiny and reporting".
The report said: "There seems a real risk that the costs and benefits of NPfIT will never be accurately assessed."
In particular Wanless singled out the lack of progress made on some of the core NHS IT projects including the electronic care record service and Choose and Book, and he warned the NPfIT contracts risk creating monopolies by using only two major software suppliers.
Wanless concluded in the report: "It is clear that there are considerable challenges ahead in modernising NHS IT systems, and continuing debate over the feasibility of some current NPfIT plans. The continuing uncertainty and delays have the potential to undermine the productivity gains envisaged by the 2002 review."
Choose & Book is never going to provide the return...
Roger Huffadine
The project from where I've been contracted is a t...
Mikal Dunne
My client needs someone with epidemiological experience. This is absolutely necessary. Use of statistical tools and techniques is also a prerequisite ...
Good technical knowledge is required for this initial 3 month contract: Skills: 1st Line Support experience Experience of Netmeeting Experience of ...
JP Gray are looking for a Choose and Book Project Manager to undertake a 3-6 month assignment at a London based PCT. In this position you will be ...
Agenda Setters 2008
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright ©1995-2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Top of page
Peter Cochrane
Peter Cochrane's Blog: Government gaffe
Misunderstanding IT… again
Martyn Hart
Green IT changes outsourcing for all
Gov't guidelines bring carbon footprint to the forefront
silicon.com
Inbox: Data breaches, tech wages, ePassport woes
"If you offer training, you'll be fighting the applicants off with the proverbial stick..."
silicon.com
Inbox: Snooping bills, spam mountains, boring IT
"Have gov't all taken leave of their senses?"
Martyn Hart
Is short-termism holding back public sector outsourcing?
Comment: Driving down bids can store up trouble
silicon.com
Inbox: YouTube surveillance, skills gap, Naked speak
"It is up to citizens to use them, and not just moan in comments to silicon.com"