Staff looking at "personal" and "sensitive" data
By Nick Heath
Published: 1 May 2008 16:47 GMT
The government faced condemnation after it emerged that 600 staff at Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (HMRC) have been disciplined for snooping on personal data.
The revelation by Treasury minister Jane Kennedy in a written answer to parliament showed that 192 staff had been disciplined last year, 180 in 2006 and 238 in 2005.
The HMRC has discussed 11 data security incidents involving customer information with the Information Commissioner's Office since April 2005, has stopped data transfers unless there is a business critical need and now demands adequate security protection for the transfer of bulk data on removable media such as CDs and memory sticks, she said in a separate answer.
A shadow home affairs spokesman said: "It's shocking that so many public officials have been sacked or disciplined for abusing people's private details.
"It underlines why we believe that the reckless handling of personal data by government officials should be made an offence."
The House of Lords recently backed a motion to make the reckless loss or distribution of data a criminal offence.
Full Disclosure campaign
silicon.com is aiming to make businesses and government take data security more seriously. Read more here.
Kennedy said the breaches related to less than one per cent of just over 90,000 staff.
She said in her written answer: "HMRC has a strict policy forbidding staff to access customer records, unless they have a legitimate business need. Breaches of this policy are taken seriously."
The government-commissioned Poynter Review of the breach that led to the loss of 25 million personal details after a junior employee posted two CDs to the National Audit Office is expected to be published imminently.
Kennedy also said the data guardians brought in to shake-up data security at the HMRC did not have power to operate outside of the existing HMRC chain of command and that business unit directors and the HMRC chairman retained ultimate responsibility for data security.
Why is anyone surprised? - all this means is that ...
Roger Huffadine
If I snooped at government data, I'd be arrested a...
Jay Carney
I'm definately not surprised about this...I have b...
Richard Davies
The Managing Director will refer to the Board of Directors.Main focus for the Managing Director will be to: The position will have full profit & loss ...
Understanding of trends in activities - Expert understanding of PbR - Inpatient and Outpatient - Sus and CDS If you are available and have an expert ...
Selling to VP of Engineering, Programme Directors then upwards and downwards. AOV $1M - 158M ($158M deal was with Boeing) - $38M (Israeli Defence ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Nick Heath
Let's shine a light into the public sector IT money pit
With £16bn being spent, why is productivity still falling?
Tim Ferguson
BBC is taking tech seriously, so give it a break!
Auntie is the envy of the world but doesn't get the credit it deserves at home...
Peter Cochrane
Peter Cochrane's Blog: Open info for all?
Government stonewalling citizens
Nick Heath
Home Office CIO on taming tech and why ID cards are good news
Interview: Annette Vernon, Home Office CIO
Nick Heath
NHS records, Google and Microsoft: Where do you want your data?
Politicians: Heal thyself
Alan Hunt
NHS network: Time to get secure
Patient data in need of a check up