But will prison fears lead to conspiracy of silence... or apathy?
Published: 24 January 2005 17:35 GMT
Company directors have been reminded that a failure to comply with tightening regulations can and will land them in prison, despite continued apathy among many.
Under regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley non-compliance can result in personal liability as well as fines and other punitive measures taken against their company and the individual responsible.
But while much has been written about SOX, one speaker at the Computer and Internet Crime Conference in London urged delegates not to take their eyes off less fashionable regulated areas as well, such as privacy.
Michael Colao, director of information management at Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, urged his peers to "go back to the office and check their privacy policy".
"What data are you keeping on staff or customers?" he asked. "And how are you keeping it?"
"If your security provisions are not up to date and there is a breach, you, the individual responsible, could face liability," he said.
However, Colao expressed concerns that such rules may encourage some individuals to try brushing even more under the carpet, especially when it is their neck on the line.
Recent research from Compuware revealed that a third of IT directors believe they will miss important compliance deadlines and, with legislation such as SOX, Basel II, the Companies Bill and the forthcoming Operational and Financial Review all bearing down on them, the juggling act is only going to get tougher.
Although 94 per cent of respondents said they were aware of their increased liability, a worrying 72 per cent said they were not at all concerned about missing deadlines.
Colao said some countries are well ahead of the game on such issues while the strictness of regulations and penalties varies wildly around the globe.
He cited the case of Italian privacy laws. In Italy, the individual charged with ensuring the required security measures are in place can be jailed for three years for non-compliance – irrespective of whether or not there has been a breach.
Other European countries were singled out for having incredibly strict privacy laws.
The implications of such variation is clear for any company dealing with customers in those countries. "Local laws become global laws," said Colao.
Back to Compliance Special Report
Here's a fact from a recent course I attended: in ...
Stuart Wilson
Good points - particularly when it comes to email ...
Dexter Michael
Whilst the mountain of regulation apears huge and ...
Anonymous
SOX compliance covers both the retention and acces...
Gordon Stevenson
Gordon, I think SOX would help in preventing anoth...
Anonymous
Decision on Microsoft antitrust fine to take "weeks"
€2m-per-day penalty on hold
Are compliance headaches only just beginning?
Financial services IT managers, get ready...
Gartner: SOX is boosting IT spend
'Budgets to increase by 10 to 15 per cent next year'
CIO Agenda, part 1: The 2006 IT shopping list
IT governance and compliance steal security's top spot
IT the key to cutting SOX costs
The compliance work isn't over yet...
Stories from around the web...
Relief from Sarbanes-Oxley on the way? CNET News.com
Chief risk officer: A valuable addition to the C-suite Globe and Mail
IT complexity confounds financial sector compliance Accounting and Finance 365 - registration required
The secret to success LegalWeek
Sarbox: The appliance of compliance Accountancy Age
Make your voice heard
silicon.com and the Bathwick Group have created an opportunity for business and IT executives to share their experience with each other and thus enhance their knowledge of the IT marketplace.
Join our research panel, and you'll be asked to participate in short surveys - and then will be privy to the answers of all your colleagues, as we send you tailored versions of the results.
For more about the Research Panel and how to join, click here
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page