Is this just a desperate last ditch attempt to boost case for ID cards?
By silicon.com
Published: 2 February 2006 17:25 GMT
It seems the Home Office - the government department tasked with the now thankless job of promoting the case for the introduction of ID cards - isn't very good at numbers.
The week started off badly for the Home Office when parliamentary watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) told MPs it was unable to sign off the department's accounts as correct because they were in such a mess.
A botched rollout of a new accounting IT system meant Home Office bean-counters, who handle an annual budget of £13bn, were unable to reconcile figures and, in just one example cited by the NAO, £3m simply disappeared without a trace.
This is the same department which has also been under the cosh for the last year or so defending its estimates for a £5.8bn price tag for introducing a national biometric ID card scheme, which critics claim will cost three times more.
Then today silicon.com revealed serious inaccuracies in the Home Office's bold claims, which were plastered all over the national media, that ID fraud costs the UK economy a whopping £1.7bn a year.
Scary stuff at first glance but there appears to be significant differences between what the Home Office classes as ID fraud and what everyone else classes as ID fraud. The Home Office, it turns out, lumps in crimes such as credit card theft and conmen trying to trick their way into pensioners' homes along with true identity theft.
Take out some of those more spurious figures and the actual cost of ID fraud comes in at less than a third of that figure, at just under £500m - still a big number, granted, but some way off the Home Office calculations.
The Home Office has denied that the ID fraud figures have been inflated to boost the case for justifying the extortionate cost of introducing national ID cards and even claimed that £1.7bn is a conservative estimate. But the Home Office also admitted getting that total is "not an exact science" and that there were "limitations" to the methodology used.
And this is why we should continue to question the Home Office figures and try to break the veil of secrecy surrounding the controversial ID cards plans. If this is how it does its sums, taxpayers should be very worried indeed.
Back to ID Cards on Trial Special Report
'Less is more" is the golden rule for better gover...
Simplify Goverment!
Im not saying i know it all but i think it is a di...
boney clair
Suppressed ID card reports 'must be made public'
28 days later
Exclusive: ID cards are here - but police can't read them
A "waste of time" for biometric ID checks
"Please give me an ID card" say UK citizens
1000 plus people queuing to sign up
ID card costs rise - but is the security weakening?
Critics attack 'flash and go' cards
'ID card guinea pig' pilots ready to call in lawyers
'How can it be voluntary if we're all going to lose our jobs?'
Stories from around the web...
Panic in No 10 as ID support collapses Telegraph
ID card academic attacks Clarke BBC
ID cards are to Blair what poll tax was to Thatcher The Times
ID Cards - UK's high-tech scheme is high risk London School of Economics
Poll shows popularity dip of ID cards Channel 4 News
Make your voice heard
silicon.com and the Bathwick Group have created an opportunity for business and IT executives to share their experience with each other and thus enhance their knowledge of the IT marketplace.
For more about the Research Panel and how to join, click here
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page