Row over compulsion continues as MPs throw bill back to the Lords...
By Andy McCue
Published: 16 March 2006 15:50 GMT
The ID cards battle remains deadlocked after MPs again overturned a House of Lords amendment that would have prevented people being forced to register for an ID card when applying for a passport.
MPs voted by 292 votes to 241 votes - an increased majority of 51 - in favour of keeping the clause in the bill to make the passport a "designated document" tied in with ID cards and the National Identity Register (NIR) database.
-- Phil Booth, national co-ordinator, No2ID
It is the second time this week that MPs have overturned House of Lords' opposition to the ID cards bill and the parliamentary ping-pong will continue on Monday when peers vote on the legislation for the fourth time.
If the House of Lords continues to oppose what critics call the "compulsion by stealth" element of the bill then the government will be forced to invoke the Parliament Act in the next session in November to get ID cards on the Statute Book.
During the debate on Thursday Home Secretary Charles Clarke accused peers of "breaking the conventions of parliament" and ignoring "the will of the people".
He said: "It's a deliberate effort by the opposition parties to sabotage the ID card bill."
But Conservative shadow home secretary, David Davis, said the government's election manifesto - promising an initially voluntary ID card rollout - was "intended to mislead".
He said: "It is ridiculous to assert that the passport is voluntary. Under this bill ID cards are not voluntary, they are clearly compulsory."
Davis also said the NIR database is the fundamental flaw in the government's ID cards plans. "It's the database behind it that's the problem. You do not need to have the NIR," he said.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, Nick Clegg, called the ID card scheme "uncosted, untested and unjustified".
Critics also rounded on the government today after the Home Office revealed that bank card-style PIN numbers - and not biometrics - would be used to verify the ID cardholder's identity in some cases.
Phil Booth, national co-ordinator of the No2ID campaign, said the Home Office's 'gold standard' of identity has now been reduced to little more than a bog standard chip and PIN card.
He said in a statement: "After all its overblown claims about the infallibility of biometrics and how highly secure its ID system will be, it turns out our identities are to be protected by nothing more than a four digit PIN. The Home Office may as well give away all our personal data to organised criminals and fraudsters, who will always target the weakest point in a system."
Back to ID Cards on Trial Special Report
Charles Clarke accused peers of "breaking the conv...
Karen Challinor
If its just a chip and pin card surely a bank ,sup...
Terry Carlin
Now that internet access is so widely available, i...
Anonymous
I could agree with Charles Clarke about blocking t...
Chris Goodman
Revealed: £12.4m cost of pilots' ID cards project
Not exactly plane sailing
Suppressed ID card reports 'must be made public'
28 days later
Exclusive: ID cards are here - but police can't read them
A "waste of time" for biometric ID checks
"Please give me an ID card" say UK citizens
1000 plus people queuing to sign up
ID card costs rise - but is the security weakening?
Critics attack 'flash and go' cards
Stories from around the web...
Panic in No 10 as ID support collapses Telegraph
ID card academic attacks Clarke BBC
ID cards are to Blair what poll tax was to Thatcher The Times
ID Cards - UK's high-tech scheme is high risk London School of Economics
Poll shows popularity dip of ID cards Channel 4 News
Make your voice heard
silicon.com and the Bathwick Group have created an opportunity for business and IT executives to share their experience with each other and thus enhance their knowledge of the IT marketplace.
For more about the Research Panel and how to join, click here
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page