'Now open source can get down to business'
Published: 4 August 2005 09:05 BST
The IT industry has reacted positively to the Mozilla Foundation's decision to create a commercial subsidiary that will be responsible for the development and distribution of its open source products.
The Foundation announced on Wednesday morning that it is creating a wholly owned subsidiary, the Mozilla Corporation, which will give it more freedom to generate revenues through commercial activities.
James Governor, an analyst at RedMonk, praised this move and said it is likely to increase the use of Mozilla's open source products, such as the Firefox browser, by businesses.
"I think it's a reasonably significant step. If Mozilla wants to do business with corporate entities, it needs to be a corporate entity - corporations want to do business with corporations," said Governor. "Almost all open source organisations that are successful have some commercial organisation around them."
Michael Goulde, an analyst at Forrester Research, said having a commercial organisation around open source software tends to give businesses the confidence to migrate from proprietary software.
"We're seeing an evolution of open source projects from pure voluntary efforts with uncertain long term viability to models that make it easier for customers to place strategic bets on open source software," said Goulde. "Mozilla Foundation's move is very much in tune with this direction, using the commercial organisation to develop a revenue stream that can support a professional staff that can manage and drive the project into the future."
The response of the Mozilla community so far has generally also been positive, with a number of postings on Mozilla employees' blogs praising the move. Mozilla contributor David Hallowell said it seems to be a good move, adding that any concerns the organisation may change the software's licence conditions are unfounded.
"I'm sure some people will be worried for the future of the Mozilla source code but there is nothing to worry about in this case. The code is published under an open licence with a huge number of contributors who would all have to give consent for the licence to be changed," Hallowell said.
Although some in the open source community may have ideological issues with Mozilla's commercial move, RedMonk's Governor expects few will be critical.
"I don't think many open source geeks will hold up their hands in horror that Mozilla is going commercial," he said.
Ingrid Marson writes for ZDNet UK
Back to Open source Special Report
South Africa plumps for Open Documents
All about interoperability...
Norwegian desktop Linux switch halted
Bergen puts open source plans on ice...
Welsh council embraces open source
Email system for schools to serve up to 40,000...
Mobile Linux movement picks up pace
Challenging the Microsoft and Symbian behemoths...
Boeing zeros in on Linux for military aircraft
'You're in the army now... '
Stories from around the web...
Q&A: Mark Spencer, CEO of open source VoIP company Digium CNET News.com
The top open source security applications CIO Today
Is open source ERP the best choice for SMBs? Search Enterprise Linux
Open source's lessons from userspace ZDNet UK
Open-source databases find their place in the enterprise Techworld.com
Choosing Desktop Linux
With its 'free' open source status and claims of high security, the appeal of Linux is clear.
Yet recent research from analysts Quocirca reveals the majority of organisations who have looked at the Desktop Linux option are still either at the experimental or limited-deployment stage.
This indicates Linux is no 'magic bullet' for Windows' shortcomings. While a move to Linux might in theory tackle some of the challenges at an operating system level, it is highly likely to create a whole bunch of other problems along the way.
To find out more about Quocirca's findings on Desktop Linux - and request a free copy of their report, click here.
Copyright ©1995-2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Top of page