But is Windows really that bad for open source?
Published: 10 August 2005 09:05 GMT
Despite their best attempts, Linux software companies say they are still having a hard time luring average consumers away from the Windows environment - but that may not necessarily be a bad thing.
Windows still dominates the PC world. About 90 per cent of all desktops, laptops and even PDAs are powered by Microsoft, according to reports by Gartner and IDC. Even with all the hoopla last year about Linux progress, the buzz over breaking the Windows stronghold has died down considerably.
When it comes to the enterprise desktop, companies like Novell and Red Hat are making some progress thanks to open source projects such as Evolution, Firefox, GNOME, KDE, OpenOffice and Wine. But the companies still report adoption problems in the consumer space.
David Patrick, vice president and general manager of Novell's Linux, open source and platforms services group, said during a press briefing at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo this week: "We feel like it is a long road for us. It certainly has not a been an overnight shift."
Novell seems to have made more progress than other companies, with its Suse Linux Professional edition for home users and Novell Linux Desktop for the corporate office.
Patrick said the company has the best success in fixed markets, as with the company's retail win with Ritz Camera and its new education contract with the state of Indiana, both announced on Tuesday.
The company also released its OpenSuse project, which Patrick says will differ from Red Hat's Fedora project in that it will let consumers help identify key open source projects before they are professionally developed.
Red Hat continues to dismiss any idea that it will offer a consumer version of its Enterprise Desktop Linux product, according to a company representative.
Expert Jeremy White, who wears a double hat as the go-to man at the Desktop Linux Consortium and as the founder and CEO of CodeWeavers, says the biggest roadblock to average consumer adoption seems to be lack of hardware support, especially for gadgets like MP3 players.
"Last year, there was a lot of smoke but no fire when it came to Linux on the desktop," he said. "It is not the sexy story that it used to be. However, there are some very steady and irreversible trends. There are a lot of customers that tell us that they would adopt Linux in theory but say, 'Gee, we would use Linux if only it could run this one application'."
The other barrier, according to White, seems to be the lack of software support by key manufacturers like Adobe Systems and Macromedia, which are strong supporters of Windows and Apple's Mac OS X but rely more on third-party companies to help their applications run on Linux.
White also suggests that crossover products like AJAX, ThinkFree, VMware and Wine are actually creating a world where Windows and Linux coexist in harmony on the desktop. Such tools allow people to run Windows programs on non-Windows systems.
In some cases, Linux is working to the advantage of corporate buyers who, according to White, are not shy about having employees working on Linux-based operating systems when the Microsoft account managers pay a visit.
"They use it like a leveraging tool, kind of like threatening Microsoft to give them better discounts or lose out on their licensing accounts," White said but added, "it's still Microsoft's game."
Brian Proffitt, editor of LinuxToday.com and co-author of The Joy of Linux, said: "In some ways Linux on the desktop is almost irrelevant because of the shift towards web-based applications.
"Linux in the enterprise is where you will see the most work being done these days because companies don't want all of those applications open at the bottom of a Windows tray. Ultimately, it comes down to what you want the Linux desktop to do."
Michael Singer writes for CNET News.com
Back to Open source Special Report
Web 2.0 prompts love for open source
Database market hits $850m
South Africa plumps for Open Documents
All about interoperability...
Norwegian desktop Linux switch halted
Bergen puts open source plans on ice...
Welsh council embraces open source
Email system for schools to serve up to 40,000...
Mobile Linux movement picks up pace
Challenging the Microsoft and Symbian behemoths...
Stories from around the web...
Q&A: Mark Spencer, CEO of open source VoIP company Digium CNET News.com
The top open source security applications CIO Today
Is open source ERP the best choice for SMBs? Search Enterprise Linux
Open source's lessons from userspace ZDNet UK
Open-source databases find their place in the enterprise Techworld.com
Choosing Desktop Linux
With its 'free' open source status and claims of high security, the appeal of Linux is clear.
Yet recent research from analysts Quocirca reveals the majority of organisations who have looked at the Desktop Linux option are still either at the experimental or limited-deployment stage.
This indicates Linux is no 'magic bullet' for Windows' shortcomings. While a move to Linux might in theory tackle some of the challenges at an operating system level, it is highly likely to create a whole bunch of other problems along the way.
To find out more about Quocirca's findings on Desktop Linux - and request a free copy of their report, click here.
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page