So say silicon.com readers...
By Sylvia Carr
Published: 14 February 2006 13:20 GMT
The idea of charging senders for each email they dispatch has long been discussed as a way to cut down on spam.
The debate over how effective this would be resurfaced recently after AOL announced a scheme whereby paid-for email would pass through its spam filters. The charge, though not yet finalised, would only be about half a penny per email but the hope is that would be enough to deter spammers who send out millions of messages.
However, a recent poll of silicon.com readers showed great pessimism in the ability of paid-for email schemes to reduce the number of junk email messages in our inboxes.
Roughly 80 per cent of the 451 readers polled said charging to send emails wouldn't stop spam. Of those, around two-thirds said it was a bad idea altogether while 12 per cent said it was better than nothing.
But not all were so pessimistic. An optimistic 15 per cent of silicon.com readers said paid-for email would stop spam, while the remaining five per cent admitted they weren't sure.
Back to The Spam Report Special Report
Spam will continue regardless of what technology o...
William Slifko
does this mean then that I can also charge compani...
Richard Davies
SPAM constitutes about 94% of the traffic delivere...
Charles Smith
If they just provided a way to be sure it came fro...
Joe Whitehead
won't everyone just set up a mail rule, "if its pa...
Chris Anderson
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page