licra
Yahoo!'s free speech suit dismissed by US court
News In April of that year, the Paris-based International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) took the web portal to court to stop sales of Nazi paraphernalia to French citizens on its auction site. [13 Jan 2006]
French court demands an end to online Nazi auctions
News found itself in the French law courts after the International League against Racism and anti-Semitism (LICRA) claimed the company was breaking French law by hosting an auction site that sold Neo-Nazi, Nazi and Ku Klux... [20 Nov 2000]
French court could force Yahoo to block Nazi site
News by the international league against racism and antisemitism (Licra), and the union of Jewish students of France (UEJF). Even with a positive outcome in the French courts, Licra will still have to fight... [07 Nov 2000]
Yahoo! under threat of French boycott
News found itself in the French law courts after International League against Racism and anti-Semitism (LICRA) claimed the company was breaking French law by hosting an auction site that sold Neo-Nazi, Nazi and Ku Klux Klan... [03 Aug 2000]
Yahoo! fixed with two month deadline by French courts
News has been fighting for the right to offer access to auctions selling Nazi memorabilia following allegations from the International league against racism and anti-Semitism (LICRA) that such an act was "an offence to the... [25 Jul 2000]
Yahoo! threatened with US court case
News The International League against Racism and anti-Semitism (LICRA) brought the case against the Californian-based company following the launch of an auction site that sold Neo-Nazi, Nazi and Ku Klux Klan objects. [24 Jul 2000]
Judge slams Yahoo! for Nazi content
News by the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) as it is illegal in France to exhibit or sell objects with racist overtones. At the time of the trial, Licra lawyer Stephane Lilti... [24 May 2000]
Yahoo! attacked for racist content
News The International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) brought the case against the Californian-based company following the launch of an auction site that sold Neo-Nazi, Nazi and Ku Klux Klan objects. [16 May 2000]