By Jo Best, 7 February 2005 15:55
NEWS While Apple is riding high on the sales of the iPod, the iconic music player is morphing into a business tool: radiologists at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), are teaming the devices with an open source platform to help the medical community cut costs.
UCLA's Dr Osman Ratib, whose background is in medical imaging, wanted to find a way to sidestep the $100,000 workstations needed to view high resolution images that required 3D rendering. With help from programmer and fellow radiologist Dr Antoine Rosset, he created OsiriX, an open source application, to enable radiologists to teleconference with the images on Mac desktop systems.
"The platform has similar functionality [to the high-end workstations], it's accessible to the rest of the medical community and you don't have to spend $100,000, $200,000 to view the images," Ratib said.
He added that he was a "strong advocate" of the open source development model. The doctors were able to build the software using ready-made components and add the environment and interface themselves.
"It took nine months to create... the platform. It very quickly took off," he said. "Before we'd showed it in any meeting, we had hundreds and very soon thousands of users."
When it came time to find a way to store the high-res images, Ratib turned to another Apple staple - the iPod.
Ratib told silicon.com: "It was difficult finding enough space on the hard disc to keep image sets... They don't fit on discs, they don't fit on memory sticks."
"It's amazing - [with iPods] people are carrying around 60GB in their pocket when I don't even have 60GB on my computer," he said. "That's the beauty of adopting consumer technology."
As well as using the iPod for storing the image sets, Ratib adapted the software to cope with the iPod photo after its release in December, giving medical staff a "cute, sexy" way to show images to other personnel.
Despite warnings from analysts that all removeable storage - including the iPod - is a security risk - Dr Ratib said that using an iPod doesn't present an additional inherent security risk.
"It's not the device, it's how you use it... I don't think an iPod has any different risk to any informatics device. We strongly recommended to anonymise the data," Ratib said.
"When [users] are outside the institution, they can be compliant or not, depending on their behaviour. It's not different to copying it to CD or memory discs."
While Ratib described the medical profession as "a little more traditional in adopting technology," the software is also enabling medical workers to start working remotely; the software is compatible with Apple's videoconferencing software, so physicians can see and share medical images.
"We rigged the software to mimic the camera... it basically shows what's on your screen" to other iChat users, Ratib said.
"We were that close to having Steve Jobs presenting it as a feature in the San Francisco keynote," Ratib said.
Comments
There are 6 comments. Join the discussion
1. Knut Boehnert
A very nice way how to establish de facto solutions.
I think any government can learn a lot from using these ways instead of implying a de jure solution that imposes a solution upon people.
There are risks to this approach too in that it starts with anarchy before de facto solutions are accepted. It takes a very good project management team to use all the ideas but the cost starting the project is probably saved in the running cost of such a built system.
Why did the NHS project sprang to my mind reading this article?
2. anonymous
This is an example of how to make an overpriced walkman into a very cheep business tool.
I hate to say it but in this the ipod is a well worth while tool.
Yes i am a Windows user!!!!!!
3. John Rudkin
Terrific lateral thinking. Like iPods for the visually disabled and iPods for learning, Apple have started something here. Those who felt obliged to say that iPod was a 'diversion' for Apple - it has proved to be a catalyst for the next generation of applications. More please........
4. anonymous
The Dr.'s in this article did what open source is intended for - creating customized solutions. Why re-invent the wheel when someone else has worked out something close to what you want but not done EVERYTHING you need?
The upside to something like this is you get a custom solution developed for little actual cost. Certainly, the Dr.'s time is a "cost" in terms of accounting or if they were working for a software company. But in cases like this the Dr.'s most likely volunteered their time. Not only saving hard dollars but creating a sense of ownership and can contribute to increase in moral/teamwork/teambuilding.
Downsides are, of course, lack of support. Who do you call when the system breaks, gets hacked, or Dr. "computer" moves on? There in lies, what I think could be the future of some "software" companies. Rather than create the software, you rent out your open source troubleshooting team on a yearly basis.
I also like the Dr.'s answer to the iPod (or removable media) being a security threat.
5. anonymous
It would be interesting to know if the "analyst" who warned of security issues is in the thrall of Microsoft.
6. Brian
Very Cool. Possible prototype for personal medical records - every thing ever done to me, and all my X-Rays - sitting on my iPod, and backed to to my iDisk...