By Ina Fried, 10 February 2005 08:35
NEWS
Hewlett-Packard says it needs a new captain, not a new course, but outsiders say the company needs to change its tack.
Despite ousting their CEO, Carly Fiorina, HP board members and executives on Wednesday said they are largely happy with the company's direction and see the company's problems as related to how the company executes its business strategy.
However, many analysts say HP remains in a bind, as it struggles to simultaneously compete against Dell's efficiency and IBM's breadth.
Ovum senior analyst Douglas Hayward said in a note on Wednesday: "The question is whether HP needs new direction or just a new driver. We think it needs a new direction. Our view is that HP has a broad portfolio whose separate parts don't work well enough together."
In a conference call with reporters, interim CEO Bob Wayman and newly installed chair Patricia Dunn maintained that HP's breadth is its strength.
The company credited Fiorina with good execution of the Compaq merger but pointed out shortfalls such as last year's well-publicised problems in the server and storage unit that led to the firing of three top executives.
"We need to make sure we have a management team and a set of processes that don't allow that to happen again," Wayman said.
But many say HP's problems run deeper, and they urge the company to look to broader changes in its business.
Meta Group analyst Nick Gall said HP needs to either find more synergy in its businesses or consider splitting up the company. Gall likened the situation to the one IBM chair Lou Gerstner faced when he took the helm at IBM.
"His strategic insight was to find what was synergistic about keeping IBM together," Gall said. "He found it in the services play."
Gall said it is not clear where HP might find its solution.
"They are stuck between a rock and a hard place, no question, which means they need to do something very creative, very innovative." Gall said. "So far, they have not done that."
On the business side, in particular, analysts criticised HP's current "Adaptive Enterprise" effort, which has been to sell itself as a less proprietary version of IBM.
Frank Gillett, an analyst at Forrester Research, said: "The Adaptive Enterprise vision didn't help crystallise the enterprise picture."
Some Wall Street analysts have long favoured a breakup of HP, arguing that the company is worth more in pieces than together. Bear Stearns analyst Andrew Neff cut his rating on HP on Wednesday to "underperform", saying the company is worth $22 to $25 a share if split (about $15 to $18.50 for the printer business and $6 to $7 for the rest). But if HP stays together, he said fair value is more likely $16.50 to $18, well below the stock's current level.
So if HP were to reshape itself, what form might it take?
Printing is clearly HP's strength, but Gall said the PC maker would have to radically transform itself to build a company centred around printers. It definitely wouldn't need servers and storage, and might not need the PC business.
"You'd have to jettison a bunch of businesses that have nothing to do with printing," Gall said.
One option, analysts say, would be to spin off those businesses and revive the Compaq brand. HP could also look to sell the PC business to an overseas player, as IBM hopes to do with Lenovo.
The company has made major investments in its cash cow in recent years - notably attempts to expand into commercial printing and the copier market.
Even as HP was waging its high-profile and hotly contested bid for Compaq, the company was also buying a company called Indigo, whose ultra high-end inkjet machine aims to take on the offset printing press for smaller and custom jobs such as printing banners, brochures and other marketing materials. Both the Indigo and copier efforts are still in their early stages.
The printer business could also benefit from more focused attention. In recent months, printing and imaging boss Vyomesh Joshi has been pulled in a variety of other directions.
First, the company added to his job responsibility for HP's overall consumer effort, including cameras and music products. And earlier this year, Joshi was also given oversight of the PC business.
Ina Fried writes for CNET News.com.

Comments
There are 5 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
I am a current HP employee (ex cpq, ex eds, ex ibm) and i say this is a fantastic move by the board. Split the printers division, sell consumer PC's, increase R&D and use services to bind the rest into a true IBM beater. We need to find a better CEO (someone from IBM would do for me) and increase the morale factor with stopping the layoffs, in short a complete reassessment.
2. Alan Benn
HP always were a technology based company, very strong in test and measurement and printing technologies. They made forays into computing in the 80's which convinced them they belong in the computing business, but they do not add technological value in modern computing, they simply bolt together technology from elsewhere. HP should remember its roots, play to its strengths and commercialise its excellent R&D.
3. Speakupboy
Everyone should forget about PCs. HP doesnt have a "pc division". It has a division that makes PCs. That same division in 10 years time will be making something else. HP has great consumer image because of the printers and the handhelds. Dell and IBM only make computers (effectively). So split the company into Consumer (IPG and PSG) and Commercial businesses (ESS and HPS). HP Consumer will walk all over Dell especially when PCs have finally died (although will need to watch out for Apple) and HP Commercial will be able to fight IBM with innovation PLUS commercialisation.
4. Mario
In order to compete on PC arena, Is HP willing to go to a 1st tier model?I have nothing against distributors and retailers, but honestly Dell has succeded without them, sorry!!!
Tie up Printing an PC and launch HP Comsumer services; sort off. of course all around Printers... not PC
Enterprise.... Software!!!, HP-UX and OpenView alone can't do the trick.
Tie up HP Services to Enterprise and launch HP Enterprise Service; sort off. HP has inside what is required to do that.
5. André van Eupen
I dare to predict the following: In a couple of months time Mrs. Fiorina will be happy being away from HP because they’ll have to sell the PC division. Why? They’re neither able to invent something new nor to copy an excellent scheme. With a new range of notebooks and the chance to do better than all other competitors, why did they develop new machines with a fixed optical drive (nc61** and nx61**)? With these new machines customers have no chance to replace the drive with a second HDD or a second battery to extend battery live and work time. Why should a customer buy a notebook if the competitor’s models offer more flexibility? I’m sure the new range will fail to increase profit margins. And by the way, they’re ugly, too!!
PS: Will any company ever offer a notebook with the style of a Toshiba Porteg?100, the tech specs, size, battery life and reliability of an IBM Thinkpad T4**(14”) and the price tag of a Dell Latitude, all combined in one machine? I would be the first customer of the day!!