silicon survey: Mobile ban backed by hypocritical third who say they're in the wrong

Fifteen per cent drive with a mobile to their ear - many say they know they shouldn't

NEWS The hard line against use of handheld mobile phones while driving isn't confined to those who never do it. Research carried out by silicon.com shows that of those who admit to operating a vehicle on the road with a handset to their ear, 31.5 per cent say such behaviour is 'Never' acceptable. Of the 2,325 readers polled, only 344 - just under 15 per cent - said they drive while holding a handset to the ear. Besides those answering 'Never', 65.3 per cent of the 344 said they use a phone that way 'When the road conditions mean it is safe to do so' - which could mean in a traffic jam or on a straightforward or uncrowded road. The remaining 3.2 per cent responded 'All the time, I am a good driver'. However, only 14.5 per cent of those who admit to talking with a handset to their ear believe 'all in-car mobile use should be banned, including texting and hands-free' - nearer the zero level one might expect from this group. For respondents who took a more hard line approach to mobile phone use in cars, answers were more predictable. Just over 20 per cent of those polled - 515 people - said they 'No, never' use a phone while driving. Out of this group, 94.5 per cent want the action to be made an offence, compared to an overall survey figure of 77.6 per cent. When it comes to punishments, 35.3 per cent of this group want a points-on-licence punishment for offenders, versus an overall figure of 29.9 per cent, and only 1.4 per cent say 'They shouldn't be punished' against 8.8 per cent for the 2,325 who shared their views. We'd like to hear what you think? Are you a hypocrite? What do you think of them? Email

Comments

There is 1 comment. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Mike Mitchell

    Life is inherently unsafe. What's next a ban against makeup application, smoking, sneezing (no driving while you have a cold, coffee dringing while driving. There are enough laws on the books. In the US there is Reckless Driving if a motorist is involved in a crash, distracted driving if you not. Who will be the arbitors of this great new life saving law-the police? The police are the ultimate distracted drivers. What with speed radar, cellular, multiple radios, and computors, how do the have time to incidently monitor for perpetrators of crime.

    • 2 December 2003 16:28
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters