'Pay to receive' calls won't happen, say UK operators

After EC chief says it's an optionÂ…

By David Meyer, 19 June 2008 08:37

NEWS

Following suggestions by Europe's telecommunications chief that she would not oppose mobile operators that wanted to charge their customers for receiving calls, all the UK's operators have denied wanting to do any such thing.

European commissioner Viviane Reding said in an interview with the Financial Times on Monday that it was "for operators to decide" whether they wanted to adjust their business models in this way. However, all the major UK operators have told silicon.com sister site ZDNet.co.uk that such a move was unlikely.

Wireless from A-Z

Click here for all there is on wireless, from email to WiMax.

A spokesperson for Vodafone said that the "likelihood of any new radical pricing is pretty slim", and confirmed that the operator had "no plans to introduce such a pricing model at the moment".

Reding's comments were in response to a question that was related to the European Commission's proposals for slashing the "termination rates" that operators charge each other to interconnect calls. On Tuesday, however, the operator 3 said in a statement "there is no reason for the EC recommendation to result in receiver pays".

A spokesperson said Orange "can confirm that it has no intention to introduce charges for [its] customers to receive calls domestically". T-Mobile's spokesperson said: "We don't plan to charge customers to receive calls in the UK."

O2's spokesperson told ZDNet.co.uk that "any move to such a system [receiving party pays (RRP)] would need to take place across the EU at once, in order not to distort the market", adding: "It is not clear that RPP actually conveys any overall benefit to consumers - in countries with RPP we tend to see much lower penetration than in the EU."

A spokesperson for Reding's office told ZDNet.co.uk that the very suggestion of RPP in Europe was a "lobbying statement" designed to make the Commission's recommendations for lower termination rates seem unattractive. The spokesperson said: "We believe that the threat by some to introduce 'receiving party pays' is an empty threat, as a company that would introduce this in Europe would kick themselves out of the market."

Comments

There are 3 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. GALLEY SLAVE#41

    I guess the E.U. can 'dream on' with this one I can't see anyone in this country standing for it.

    For a start the number of calls accepted would fall to a trickle so the companies will lose money.
    Unsolictited calls and NUMBER WITHELD calls would stop altogether
    (MIGHT NOT BE A BAD THING !!!)

  2. 2. Tony Life

    If my operator ever got involved with such an idea I would leave straight away. I have enough trouble getting money back for texts I never asked for.

  3. 3. Nick Cole

    Does anybody really expect us to pay for the privilege of receiving unwanted calls, over which we have no control?

    It is bad enough paying for bandwidth that is wasted on spam but at least that is inclusive.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ