2020: When the world and its toothbrush gets online

How will the networks cope with 50 billion connected devices?

NEWS

Fifty billion connected devices are coming to cellular networks in the next decade, according to Ericsson - as everyday objects go mobile.

Ericsson's VP of systems architecture, Håkan Djuphammar, predicted the years to come could see connectivity spread to some of the very smallest household items.

"[In 10 years' time], everything has connectivity. We're talking about 50 billion connections, all devices will have connectivity - your cameras, your everything.

"I'm not sure if you will have broadband in your toothbrush but maybe your dentist wants to know [how you brush your teeth] so why not? Connect everything," he told Ericsson's Business Innovation Forum in Stockholm last week.

This mobile 'internet of things' - machine-to-machine connections in smart toothbrushes and the like - will help fuel the industry's growth, according to Ericsson.

Jan Håglund, deputy head of IP and broadband networks at the infrastructure company, told delegates: "The ceiling for mobile is completely different than the ceiling for fixed access. The ceiling for fixed access is basically the number of homes and enterprises - whereas the ceiling for mobile is not even the amount of people but it's maybe the amount of things," he said.

So far, so futuristic. But can the mobile industry cope with this traffic explosion?

A recent report by analyst house In-Stat predicts mobile backhaul capacity demand will triple between 2009 and 2013 as data consumption continues to grow.

According to Ericsson, mobile traffic is doubling every year - or in other words the industry is looking at carrying 1,000 times more traffic in a decade.

Intel's John Woodget, global director, telecoms sector, gave more conservative data growth predictions, however - at least 20 billion connected devices by 2020 and a 300-fold increase in traffic - but he warned that even at that level of growth the challenge "may be far greater than we expect".

"The big challenge for the telecoms world is they've got to figure out some ways of generating revenues - getting a share of wallet… to invest in the infrastructure build out. We're going to need a huge infrastructure build out," he added.

Woodget said the problem is that business models capable of monetising the hyper-connected world are not there yet.

"This unprecedented growth - this huge wave of traffic that's coming onto the network doesn't have an understood business model that's going to pay for investment to continue growing the infrastructure. That's the challenge that we face," he told the Forum.

According to Woodget, 'free' is not the answer. Free content and free flat-rate mobile data tariffs do not offer a sustainable business model for an age when the world and its toothbrush are online, he said.

"Right now it's sustainable because most of us aren't consuming gigabytes of data but are paying for the few who are - but what happens if that continues?" he asked.

Instead, mobile operators need to look at "two-sided business models" the Intel exec said - in other words not just selling connectivity to mobile users but also selling user data to third parties who are building services. He added that collaboration with different players - be they software and app makers, or even the car industry - is going to be the order of the day.

"We can't do this on our own. We don't think any player can actually dominate the market on their own - it requires collaboration," Woodget said.

Comments

There are 2 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Karen Challinor

    well with our massive 2Mb/s guaranteed connection and every electrical component in the world trying to squeeze through it, I'd say we'll be in the IT equivalent of the stone age compared to the rest of the world

    • 30 June 2009 11:23
    • Add comment
  2. 2. src2000

    More wireless at the edge will drive the need for groeth in 'wired' infrastruycture at the core. If the price point for data volume or even data point is right and delievres some sort of service that provides value then there may be a cost model. Potentially, the need to pay for the infrastructure should start to drive up costs of content which implies we may take a little more interest in the content we upload/download, but somehow, I don't think so. As the younger people desire to be celebrities (often confused with number of facebook friends/twitter followers etc.) the content explosion will continue, The only problem will remain finding enough time or developing content filters to enable you yo have a real life in addition to the virtual one.

    • 13 January 2011 14:52
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters