Minority Report: Can Palm Pre beat the iPhone?

Smartphones go head-to-head

By Seb Janacek, 8 July 2009 09:00

COMMENT

Palm is challenging Apple in the smartphone space, big time. Seb Janacek looks at why the impending face-off is so important.

The Palm Pre - which we've just found out will be carried exclusively by O2 in the UK - is undoubtedly one of the most interesting new challengers to the smartphone market and to the iPhone in particular.

It's a hugely compelling product launch for Palm - and for Apple, for a number of reasons.

Firstly, because it is unashamedly an iPhone competitor in every sense of the word. Palm's marketing has positioned the Pre as everything you ever wanted in an iPhone and were tired of waiting for - at least prior to the release of the iPhone OS 3.0 update.

Most notable among these features is a little slide-out keyboard and the mythical copy-and-paste function. The Pre has also been released at a time when early iPhone adopters' contracts are drawing to an end.

Secondly, Palm is made up of a large number of former Apple employees who have brought with them a wealth of insider product and marketing information.

Palm's CEO Jon Rubinstein is Apple's former iPod chief. Rubinstein and Apple chief Steve Jobs go way back - Rubinstein worked at former Jobs venture NeXT, then followed Jobs to join the Apple hardware team in 1997.

Thirdly, the way in which Palm has engaged its main competitor so aggressively has caused a few raised eyebrows. One of the Pre's marketed features is essentially a hack of Apple's iTunes software.

The controversial feature is its ability to sync music with Apple's iTunes music software, which it does by effectively pretending to be an iPod when connected to a computer.

Apple's COO Tim Cook has already fired a shot across Palm's bows when he said that the company welcomed competition as long as it wasn't stealing their IP.

Apple didn't tolerate the hacking influences of Real when it tried to break Apple's DRM technology for its own commercial benefit.

The Cupertino company has already indicated that it will adopt a zero tolerance approach to its new competitor. In an article published on its support site recently, Apple highlighted to consumers that it doesn't provide iTunes support for third-party media players.

The decision to effectively hack iTunes but also market it as a key feature is a risky strategy for a company which has invested all its hopes on the Pre. The Pre could be Palm's saviour or it could prove the final nail in the coffin.

The company reported a dismal quarter for the three months ending 30 May. It reported a loss of $91.5m compared with a year-earlier loss of $41.1m. Revenue fell 71 per cent to $86.8m.

However, with the mix of features and people behind it Palm represents a real challenge for Apple and the iPhone - if it can remain commercially viable.

On a personal note I'm delighted with Palm's arrival and despite being an iPhone owner it's great to see another innovative company enter the market.

In the last week, I've played with the HTC Android phone and the Nokia N97. I was left unsatisfied with the clunky, plasticky feel of the former and the unresponsive touch interface of the latter (as well as its terrifying slide-out keyboard action that threatens to send the phone flying out of your hands and across the room).

The appearance of the Pre on the scene is exciting. I have yet to play with a Pre but can't wait. I was an avid fan of Palm's PDAs and owned a IIIx and the gloriously sexy Vx. As touchscreen devices go they were up there with the Newton as the most innovative user interfaces, until the iPhone came along.

Initial sales of the Pre have been encouraging but not comparable to sales of the iPhone. It currently has few applications in its own online app store but these are early days.

In a recent statement, CEO Rubinstein said: "The launch of Palm Web OS and Palm Pre was a major milestone in Palm's transformation; we have now officially re-entered the race.

"We have more to accomplish, but the groundwork is laid for a very promising future here at Palm."

Amen to that.

Comments

There are 5 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Martin Turner

    The iPhone for people who refuse to have an iPhone, perhaps?

    I agree with the article -- this is the first time we've seen a real competitor to the iPhone. Earlier offerings, especially Nokia's and Blackberry's, were essentially upgrades on products which they already had, with a few iPhone features thrown in, and the claim 'look, this is better than an iPhone - just check the specs'. The specs were always better, but the user experience was the same clunky one we knew and hated.

    There is a vast reservoir of people out there who have told their friends over and over again that they hate the iPhone, will never get an iPhone, think the iPhone is stupid, etc. What they really mean is, they desperately want an iPhone, but came out early against it and now don't want to be seen to change their minds.

    The Palm Pre seems tailor made for them, and I hope it does very well.

  2. 2. Ruairi O

    You said you've played with "The android Phone" which one there's now 4 on the market, under at least 7 different names.
    HTC Dream (G1), Magic & Hero (G1 Touch)
    Samsung i7500 (Galaxy)

  3. 3. Joe Anonymous

    What an incredible mess of misdirections. Let's pick a few:

    1. You claim that the iPhone doesn't do copy and paste. Wrong. It does copy and paste (any 3G or 3GS iphone).

    2. You gloss over how miserably the Palm has sold since it's release. It took them weeks to hit 300 K units - while Apple was over a million in the first weekend.

    3. You gloss over the lack of software for the Pre. Over 50,000 apps available for the iPhone.

    4. No mention of the miserable battery life of the Pre.

    5. You fail to mention that virtually every published comparison shows the iPhone to be much faster at almost everything than the Pre (at least, when you can evaluate the phones performance without network interference).

    The Pre is an acceptable product, but it's not an iPhone killer. Not even close.

  4. 4. Ian Sargent

    So the Palm Pre now provides competition for the Apple iPhone.

    But in the UK both are exclusive to O2 - when are we going to see competition in the network provider stakes?

  5. 5. Fred Stein

    A better question is "What must Pre do to survive?" They need more ISVs. But which ones, what kinds of ISVs?

    Also why is iPhone the product to beat vs Blackberry, or other smart phones?

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ