BT’s Verwaayen joins UK top earners

But avoids being a million-a-year man

NEWS BT boss Ben Verwaayen last year became one of the UK's best paid directors, pulling in around £2.2m in cash with another guaranteed £849,000 worth of shares to come in three years’ time. The figures turned up in the phone giant’s annual report published yesterday. Verwaayen received: a basic £700,000 salary; pension allowance and other benefits of £140,000; housing expenses of £450,000; other benefits worth £35,000 and, oh yes, a cash bonus of £849,000 with another £849,000 worth of shares in a deferred bonus. “Quite frankly, he murdered the targets,” said a BT spokesman, referring to Verwaayen’s bonus. And he has. There has been a 61 per cent earnings per share growth, a 37 per cent drop in customer dissatisfaction and handy ‘free cashflow’ of £1.7bn. It does look like shareholder money well spent. But old fat cat habits die hard. House moving expenses of £200,000 may look a bit stiff but they are a one-off. However, a £250,000-a-year housing allowance for a man who already had a house in the UK looks rather like concealed salary. Included in with his basic pay it would have made him a million pound man, which we can assume is a headline that the BT board wished to avoid. The deferred bonus is interesting. It seems to turn the idea of share options on its head. Verwaayen and other directors will get the stated value worth of shares in three years’ time, whatever the share price, according to a BT spokesman. Other BT directors in the bonus bonanza will receive only half the worth of their cash bonus in shares in three years time. Finance director Ian Livingston was tossed an extra £190,000 to make up for not getting it by staying with Dixons, his previous employer.

Comments

There are 2 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    He deserves every penny, the way he's turned it around. And no, I don't work for BT.

    • 21 October 2003 18:10
    • Add comment
  2. 2. anonymous

    You must be joking. No one deserves that type of money. And don't give me that international comparisons argument. Otherwise all execs would be in America, or UAE or somewhere.

    • 21 October 2003 18:14
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters