Icann plans thwarted by US bill

Dot-com and dot-net up in the air...

NEWS Two US congressmen introduced a bill on Thursday that would block an Icann plan to give control of all expiring domains ending in dot-com and dot-net to VeriSign. The bill also calls for a federal investigation of Icann's business practices. A pair of Washington state politicians, on behalf of a collection of companies that register domain names, said they intend to block a controversial procedure that would establish VeriSign as a central place to buy all expiring dot-com and dot-net domains. The legislation also considers transforming Icann into a federal advisory committee, effectively ending its quasi-independent status as a separate organisation that has a contract with the US government. Last year, Icann approved a plan that would, in effect, give a sizable boost to VeriSign's bottom line by shifting revenue that is currently shared by the scores of accredited registrars. The registrars bitterly opposed the idea - called the Wait-Listing Service - but were rebuffed by the Icann board. In response, some irked registrars created the Domain Justice Coalition and turned to Congress for help. The bill, sponsored by representatives Brian Baird and Jay Inslee, both Washington state Democrats, would place Icann's decision on hold and order the US General Accounting Office to investigate Icann's business practices. Christine Jones, general counsel for registrar Go Daddy Software, said: "The bill is necessary because Icann has failed to follow its own policies. We're hoping that a study by the General Accounting Office over whether Icann is effective in following its own rules will force Icann to do what it's supposed to do, follow the consensus (among registrars), and oppose the Wait-Listing Service." Called the Fair, Transparent, and Competitive Internet Naming Act of 2003, the bill requires the US General Accounting Office, the auditing arm of the US Congress, to "conduct a study regarding the business practices, procedures, accountability and administration" of Icann. One of Icann's own board members sued the group for access to its records, which led to a state judge last year ordering Icann to open its books. An Icann spokeswoman said the wait-list change would not become effective until after an October board meeting in Carthage, Tunisia. "We welcome any kind of interest in Icann because we are a transparent and accountable organization," Icann spokeswoman Mary Hewitt said. "Whether it's the US government or Belgium that wants to look at us, we welcome the interest. We post everything on our website." Declan McCullagh writes for News.com

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters