Customer sues over website pricing blunder

PC World Business failed to honour incorrect online price for 2,000 CDs...

NEWS A PC World Business customer is taking the company to court later this month for failing to honour the purchase of 2,000 CDs that were incorrectly priced on its website. Graeme McKenna has issued proceedings against PC World Business in the small claims court for £2,080 – the correct price of the CDs he ordered online last month. The case could set a legal precedent that will help resolve the confusion around website pricing errors such as the £7 iPaq PDAs on Amazon.co.uk and the Thai Airways free flights fiasco. McKenna placed an order for 20 boxes of 100 Maxwell CD-Rs on 18 July, which were priced at £0.89 plus VAT per box, leading to a total order and delivery price of £32.61 for 2,000 CDs. Although friends he had told about the bargain were told by PC World Business that the price should have been per CD and they would not take the order, McKenna received an order confirmation and his bank card was debited the following morning. In legal terms this means a contract has been formed and that technically the company has accepted the order and is obliged to honour it. But when the CDs turned up there were only 20 and not 2,000. PC World Business told McKenna there was a mistake with the unit price on the website and offered him a full refund for the return of the goods. When he queried this after consulting Trading Standards, the company told him that it was obvious the price on the site was wrong and that he had tried to take advantage of it. An email from the firm's legal team said: "We will not however send him the number of CD's in accordance with the mistake. There is no legal requirement to do so by virtue of the existence of a mistake. There is no way a purchaser could reasonably have supposed that 2000 CD's could be purchased for the sum of £27.75 plus VAT." PC World Business now has until 16 August to respond to the proceedings. McKenna said: "At the time I truly believed they were clearing stock or it was end of line stuff. I don't think a judge is going to look favourably upon a company who changes their terms to suit themselves." Craig Williams, ecommerce manager at PC World Business was not immediately available for comment.

Comments

There are 2 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. Tony

    Be nice to hear the end of this story - It is December 2003 now - did he win? Did PC World get away with it?

    • 1 December 2003 10:43
    • Add comment
  2. 2. anonymous

    So what happened? Their was clearly no meeting of the minds - PC World did not intend to sell at that price, and made mistakes, but in my view intent is the issue. Under the Law of Contract, the meeting of the minds leading to mutual intent to contract at that price is key to the Judge's findings.

    • 1 December 2003 11:42
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters