Consumers suffering from fixed-line 'monopoly'

BT and Oftel come in for a roasting from government

NEWS A report from the Public Accounts Committee published today has slammed BT and former regulator Oftel, saying the 'quasi-monopoly' of the telco is bad news for the fixed-line market – and especially for consumers.

Despite Oftel's attempts to open up the fixed-line domain, BT still has 75 per cent of the market. The PAC thinks that more consumers should be switching to other suppliers to save themselves money and it's down to the telecoms watchdog Ofcom to tell them how.

The recent advertising blitz between BT and competitors, each pushing various packages and discounts, has left consumers bemused and unable to find out which tariff works best for them, the report, The Office of Telecommunications - Helping Consumers Benefit from Competition in the Telecommunications Market, concludes. "Whether consumers can make informed choices depends on whether they can make meaningful comparisons between companies," it says.

Confusing phone bills don’t help either, the PAC said, meaning that consumers don't have the right information to hand to allow them to choose the phone company that best suits their needs. It also levels blame at Oftel, saying the former regulator was "remote" from consumers and didn't offer enough guidance.

"Its guidance did not give practical examples of how consumers might make choices and its external publicity budget in 2002-03 of £45,000 was only 0.2 per cent of its overall budget of £19.5m. It nevertheless told us that if consumers continued not to switch to the most beneficial options, it would have to question human nature in the face of overwhelming information," the report says.

It also concludes that the pressure is now on Ofcom to do a better job and that it should be actively encouraging consumers to switch supplier.

Unsurprisingly, BT is less than impressed and a statement from the telco says that it "utterly refutes" the idea the regulator should encourage a switch: "[Ofcom's] key role is to ensure that consumers have a wide choice of supplier and that there are no barriers to entry. This situation already exists in the UK."

BT also dodges blame on the question of a confusing marketplace, accusing competitors of muddying the waters: "Consumers can be confused by some of our competitors comparing their 'best' prices with our "standard" ones - rather than our most popular packages - but BT is not to blame for this."

It's not all bad news for the telco, however. The PAC believes that the company's Light User scheme could be a good option for many people currently not taking advantage of the tariff to cut their bills and is pushing for an Ofcom study into why more eligible consumers haven't signed up.

Comments

There are 9 comments. Join the discussion

  1. 1. anonymous

    BT cannot be blamed for consumer imertia. There are plenty of choices out there and with a bit of gumption most consumers should be able to make an informed decision.

    This is similar to the EU Microsoft ruling. I love 90% of what comes with Windows and XP. I happen to prefer RealPlayer and use that exclusivly.

    This is just another example of the Nanny State making our decisions for us. Market forces and consumer choice are already at play - don't blame BT/Microsoft for consumer indifference/stupidity.

    • 24 March 2004 10:11
    • Add comment
  2. 2. Karen Meidl

    The reasons why a lot of users dont make use of BT's Light User scheme is that we are explicitly told by BT that the scheme is NOT available to users who channel their phone calls through other lower-cost providers.

    Since we HAVE to use and pay for BT landlines, we have no choice but to piggy back on their lines and pay standard charges.

    On the one hand, it's unfair to customers. But as much as I don't like BT's pricing policy, it is EXTREMELY unfair that they have to foot the bill for maintenance of these lines only to have a lot of their customers go somewhere else for calls.

    Anyone know a way out?

    • 24 March 2004 12:25
    • Add comment
  3. 3. anonymous

    I am required by my ISP to have a BT line. I don't know to what extent this is true for other ISPs, but it must be a factor in the so-called 'inertia'.

    • 24 March 2004 13:07
    • Add comment
  4. 4. anonymous

    Wholesale Line rental 2 is now available (WLR2), this is the much improved version of WLR1, where by the consumer can arrange for there call carrier to take over the line rental as well. You will need to check with your calls provider to see if they offer this and you can expect to save around 10-15% on your line rental.

    • 24 March 2004 14:27
    • Add comment
  5. 5. ali westerman

    We (or the herd as Oftel may like to think of us) contrary to popular belief CAN read a BT bill and we DO understand that the options are out there for us. The main reason we don't change is that while we still have to pay BT for the line rental it is impractical to change! Most consumers pick a service from BT that suits them closely simply to avoid having to pay two different companies. I for one would change today if I didn't have to involve more than one company.

    • 24 March 2004 15:15
    • Add comment
  6. 6. Mike Johnson

    As long as BT controls the 'last mile' it will continue to operate as it does today. Cometition comes from access to local exchanges, BT were allowed by Oftel to abuse their position. Just remember the length of the CPS saga, or the opening local exchanges to co hosting of OEM's to remember what tricks they will get up to. If effective competition is blossom it can only do so if Ofcom force BT quickly to comply, otherwise this stagnation will continue.

    • 24 March 2004 21:24
    • Add comment
  7. 7. anonymous

    BT provide better reliability and service plus at least equable prices overall, could this be the reason people don't move from BT, it certainly is for me

    • 25 March 2004 09:35
    • Add comment
  8. 8. anonymous

    can anyone out there even understand their phone bill from bt???? You'd have to be a rocket scientist!!I've just switched from bt together to line rental only and it cost me almost £10!!! to telephone a very nice man somewhere in India to cancel my internet!! His first language was obviously not english, which I must point out was not his fault, but surely we deserve better. The conversation would have flowed much better if we both knew what each other was saying.He then put me onto a very nice indian speaking lady who tried to chat in broken english. Not good enough BT and all the other service providers out there who are using cheap labour to fleece us and line their own pockets!!!

    • 26 March 2004 10:15
    • Add comment
  9. 9. anonymous

    I read with interest the comments about Wholesale Line Rental 2. However, I have been unable to find any additional information - can anyone point me in the right direction? The Ofcom website didn't appear to contain any info

    • 16 April 2004 17:27
    • Add comment

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters