By Will Sturgeon, 27 July 2004 17:00
NEWS The tendency to blame all society's ills on the internet continued apace today with a report from children's charity NCH which claimed online bookies are failing to stop children from gambling.
The problem rests with children being able to set up accounts online with a whole host of bookies using their Solo debit cards, which banks now distribute to children as young as 11. The lack of any face-to-face contact means that in many cases a child would merely have to lie about their age in order to register.
The NCH investigation found that a 16-year-old girl was able to register with 30 out of 37 online bookies operating in the UK.
Andrew McIntosh, minister for gambling, said: "These are very worrying findings. Having already warned the industry that Solo cards should be treated with caution it is disappointing to find so many haven't taken this on board."
While McIntosh acknowledged the banks also play a part there are many who still feel the bookies are wrongly being singled out ahead of more culpable parties - especially those in the media who are already using this survey as another stick with which to beat 'the internet'.
Currently Abbey National, Barclays, HBOS, HSBC, Lloyds TSB, NatWest and RBS all make debit cards available to under-18s yet it is the bookies that end up shamed in the newspapers and on television, with little mention of the roles played by banks, the government and parents.
John Carr, internet consultant at NCH and father of the 16-year-old who conducted the research, said: "Everybody has a responsibility here: the banks, the betting sites, the government and the parents, but what this research specifically details is the fact that the majority of sites we tested are failing to properly verify the age of people when they sign up."
"The technology is there to do this - it's not blue-sky stuff - so it's a problem which needs to be solved now," said Carr.
Although keen to point out his company is one which now no longer accepts payments by Solo or Electron cards, Ed Pownall from UK online bookie Blue Square still believes the issue is being blown out of proportion and the blame misdirected.
Pownall believes banks in particular should be doing far more to help those in his industry. In the US, credit card numbers include a four-digit code which blocks them from being accepted in gambling transactions.
Blue Square's Pownall also believes a greater understanding of the extent of the problem needs to be ascertained - beyond simply establishing whether it is possible.
Although NCH was able to get one 16-year-old girl set up with accounts, that doesn't necessarily mean others her age will be doing likewise and actually go on to gamble. According to GamCare, which helps victims of gambling addictions, juvenile gambling problems owe more to slot machines in arcades and pubs than they do to the currently vilified gambling websites.
Pownall said: "Does anybody really think the playgrounds of Britain are filled with groups of children discussing who will win at Goodwood?"
Blue Square's Pownall also questioned the methodology of the research which tested how many sites "were unable to block access of an underage player at point of registration", according to the wording of the report. Pownall said: "While it may be easy for children to set up an account it is very hard for them to actually carry on and bet."
The role of the government may also need to be examined more closely. While the minister for gambling was willing to condemn the bookies, some may think this is a little rich given the fact new laws governing the operation of internet gambling sites won't be introduced until later this year, despite the fact websites have been taking bets now since the late nineties.
According to Carr, even once passed, the laws may not come into effect for another 18 months.
Comments
There are 8 comments. Join the discussion
1. Tim Haveron Jones
This all smacks of double standards.
While the Oxford students who ethically hacked the University's network have been roundly condemned (and last time I looked might even be kicked off their courses) no-one seems to bat an eyelid over a 16-year-old girl lying about her age to gain access to gambling sites.
2. Russ
Indeed. Good reporting Silicon. It's good to have a tech-literate news source that can offer well thought out and perspicuous comment to counter balance the inevitable 'blame the internet' approach favoured by some in the pulped wood media.
I fear this issue is simply going to be one battle in a much larger conflict.
3. Chris Wright
This research is rubbish! The guy's daughter who carried it out only "registered" - I think if she'd placed a bet a number of bookies would have blocked the transaction. This is just a question of when the age verification systems kick-in... yet NCH has gone and put out this research making the bookies sound like criminals. This would be like saying all pubs are breaking the law because my 16-year-old daughter gained access to 20 out of 20 ... while not mentioning what happened when she tried to buy a drink.
4. anonymous
What about the parents who have left it to the TV to baby-sit their kids? Or let them play slot machines as weekend entertainment? Surely, these parents are not the ones complaining now, are they?
5. Steve Cooper
What rubbish - well said Chris. This report is nonsense. Kids may not even be gambling online! But, if they are it's not the bookies to blame. I speak to my kids about the dangers of gambling, smoking, drinking, taking drugs - everything - and I believe I responsibly keep tracks on what they are doing and what they are spending their money on. You can never be 100% sure though, but if I found my 16-year-old son was gambling online I'd blame, in order: 1) Myself for not better informing him of the risks 2) his natural curiosity - we all break the rules growing up and few who are brought up well BY THEIR PARENTS develop serious problems 3) the government for allowing this to go unregulated 4) the banks for giving my son a card he could use. The bookies wouldn't even feature.
To use Chris's pub analogy - if my son gave the landlord no reason to believe he wasn't 18 then I really couldn't blame him for my boy getting drunk.
For crying out loud - these are bookmakers... who would trust their child's upbringing to a bookie? Parents should take a good look at themselves before blaming others.
6. Mike Hart
16 Yrs. of age is above the age of criminal responsibility, and the girl concerned should be prosecuted if she sought to register for herself.
At 16 she will be very aware of what is right and wrong, so let's stop portraying her as the "victim".
7. Graham
Erm, where's the story here? At the age of 16 I was merrily drinking, smoking pot and taking various other recreational substances, staying out to all hours and generally doing as much as I could to waste my life away. Now I'm an IT manager. Must be because I didn't gamble, eh?
8. anonymous
I would advise caution & care to be exercised about anything coming from the NCH regarding the Internet.
The organisation does now seem to be run by zealots who have fixed, single track, opinions in many areas & have been shown to have distorted, or 'spun' facts to suit their 'zealot' agenda on various occasions.
I now categorise the NCH alongside provenly incompetent 'social workers', etc. (Who almost always seem to have 'strange', agendas.)