NEWS A UK man who runs a website that once supported the BitTorrent peer-to-peer file-sharing application is facing the threat of being sued by four major US movie studios.
Kevin Reid has been accused of copyright infringement by Paramount Pictures, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal City Studios and Warner Brothers. They filed a lawsuit in the US courts earlier this month claiming that copyright-protected films have been uploaded and downloaded from bds-palace.co.uk, which Reid runs.
At present, Reid has not been formally named as a defendant in the lawsuit. Lawyers representing the four labels have served him with legal papers which invite him to reach a settlement. Reid, though, plans to fight the action.
David Harris, an IT and intellectual property lawyer at UKITLaw.com, who is representing Reid, said: "This complaint is entirely without foundation. Mr Reid has behaved entirely properly in running his website." He described the lawsuit as "cynical and premature".
Harris added: "BitTorrent is an innovative and lawful technology and while some visitors to the site may have engaged in copyright infringement Mr Reid had no role in this. His site did no more than provide a forum for the public to discuss movies and current events relating to films. Mr Reid deplores copyright infringement and when made aware of unlawful sharing he immediately removed torrents."
With BitTorrent, a single file is broken up into many small fragments which are distributed between many computers. To download a file, a user first downloads a torrent file which contains a link to a tracker server, which has a log of users who have copies of the relevant BitTorrent fragments on their PCs.
Torrent files were shared at bds-palace.co.uk but Reid is understood to have removed torrent files that could have been unlawful. Supporters of BitTorrent argue that tracker servers don't violate copyright law as they do not host content themselves, in the same way that a search engine merely points to information.
Some people who ran BitTorrent tracker servers have closed them down in the face of legal threats from the movie industry but it appears that Hanff and Reid may both make a stand.
"The movie studios are not interested in preventing copyright infringement so much as killing an innovative technology used primarily lawfully but which frightens them be cause of its potential for abuse," said Harris.
"The studios could have chosen to work with our client [Reid] and assist him in policing the site; instead they have chosen to posture with meritless litigation. Our client will fight this case aggressively and prevail," he added.
Graeme Wearden writes for ZDNet UK.
Comments
There are 3 comments. Join the discussion
1. anonymous
BitTorrent solutions remove the last argument the big boys have for excessive charging and profit making.
They can see the end in sight and will no doubt use all sorts of legal guerilla tactics to try and slow down its adoption
Next time I sell an axe and the customer uses it to break down the front door of tewentieth century Fox, I hope I am not blamed for copyright infringment, if the user steals some DVD's!
2. SmartITGuy
In case you haven't been paying attention... The UK and Australia are now new States of the United States.
So, basically US law applies to these 2 new states.
The UK and Austrailia have demonstrated time and time again that they will do whatever makes the RIAA and MPAA happy, including tossing citezens they're sworn to protect - in with the sharks (lawyers).
I'd like to offer my most sincere condolences Mr. Kevin Reid!
When Governments start sacrificing it's own citizens, it's time to enact some laws to make governments accountable for betraying it's own people.
It's time for all technology companies to move to Canada. Where the gov't is NOT run by US industry.
3. prasadjachak
what is mistake of reid! as content is posted by other person..track him down na..who posted this...for e.g.terrorists gives threats to some country for destruction by using gmail or yahoo..den whom to blame..gmail , yahoo or that terrorists..by using this tacticts dey will not even bother to sue gmail or yahoo as they sended threats for terrorism...what kind of logic is this? dont kill technology...just punish those people who make bad use of technology...