Microsoft: Move Google countersuit to federal court

Who's afraid of the big bad bias?

NEWS In a likely effort to remove local bias in favour of Google, Microsoft is attempting to shift Google's countersuit in the Kai-Fu Lee case from a California court to federal court.

A 29 July court filing by Microsoft technically means the case has moved to federal court. But Google can still ask a federal judge to let the case surrounding the ex-Microsoft executive proceed in state court, according to a legal expert.

Late last month, Microsoft filed to switch to federal court Google's request that a California judge invalidate Microsoft's non-compete agreement with Lee, who was hired by Google to head its China operations. In its filing with the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Microsoft argued that the dispute qualifies as a federal case in part because the two companies are based in different states.

Microsoft may be seeking to reduce the possibility that pro-Google sentiment in Santa Clara County would influence the state court, said another attorney who's followed the case. Federal judges are not elected, and potential jurors for the federal court located in San Jose, California, would hail from a wider geography, he said. Google is based in Mountain View, California, a city in Santa Clara County.

Neither Microsoft nor Google immediately responded to requests for comment.

The change in court venue adds another twist to a bitter and legally complex dispute between two of the tech world's biggest players.

After Google announced Lee would lead its Chinese operations last month, Microsoft sued both of them in a Washington state court. Microsoft claimed Lee was violating a non-compete clause of his employment agreement in accepting his new job.

A Washington judge has ruled that until at least September, Lee cannot perform work at Google that competes with what he did at Microsoft - including planning for the Chinese search market.

With its California request, Google appeared to be trying to take advantage of a state rule that frowns on non-compete contract clauses.

Ed Frauenheim writes for CNET News.com

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your silicon.com account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

Get silicon.com's daily newsletter

  • Register on silicon.com

    Enter your email to register

Keep in touch with silicon.com

silicon.com newsletters