Cabinet Office website has some downtime

From planned to unplanned...

By Tom Espiner, 2 December 2005 08:35

NEWS

The Cabinet Office website was forced offline on Wednesday because of technical problems, the government has admitted.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said the site was offline due to "maintenance being carried out by our ISP", which is understood to be Pipex.

The period of downtime began on Wednesday morning. The site was available by Wednesday evening but had vanished again by Thursday morning, reappearing once more by Thursday lunchtime.

According to Cabinet Office webmaster, David Stiffell, the downtime was caused by a network routing problem.

He said: "Basically the hosters are moving facilities - this is a third-party problem with their network routing." Stiffell added that the Cabinet Office uses a number of telecoms service providers, and that Pipex hosts its servers.

Pipex had not responded to requests for comment at the time of writing.

Stiffell declined to discuss whether the terms of the government's contracts with its suppliers would allow it to claim compensation but he indicated that the Cabinet Office is not pleased with the situation.

Stiffell said: "Would you be happy? I'm not."

He explained that the website was successfully moved from Pipex to servers run by BT but that the router problems occurred with the migration back from BT to Pipex.

He said: "It was planned maintenance, and the move to the BT service was completed successfully. But when we moved back, our ISP had router problems."

Last week the Cabinet Office published eAccessibility of public sector services in the European Union, a comprehensive report on accessibility of government online services across the European Union.

The report revealed that only three per cent of the 436 online public service websites achieved a Level A rating, which is considered to be the minimum standard under the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. A further 10 per cent achieved limited level A and 17 per cent got a marginal fail Level A. The remaining 70 per cent were found to fail Level A. No websites tested reached the higher double A standard, according to the Cabinet Office.

The Cabinet Office didn't see a contradiction between its efforts to promote eAccessibility and its website problems.

Stiffell said: "It could be more ironic - if the issue of resilience had been covered in the report. eAccessibility and resilience are separate issues."

Tom Espiner writes for ZDNet UK

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Log in or create your silicon.com account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy.

Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ